The effects of acute stress on attentional networks and working memory in females

•An acute stress manipulation did not affect attention networks or working memory.•Baseline salivary cortisol was associated with longer reaction times on both tasks.•Cortisol impairments appear at higher cognitive loads on the n-back task.•The standard ANT may be less sensitive to the effects of st...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physiology & behavior 2021-12, Vol.242, p.113602-113602, Article 113602
Hauptverfasser: Stone, Caleb, Ney, Luke, Felmingham, Kim, Nichols, David, Matthews, Allison
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•An acute stress manipulation did not affect attention networks or working memory.•Baseline salivary cortisol was associated with longer reaction times on both tasks.•Cortisol impairments appear at higher cognitive loads on the n-back task.•The standard ANT may be less sensitive to the effects of stress than other versions. Neurobiological models indicate that acute stress facilitates bottom-up stimulus processing while impairing top-down executive control. To test this hypothesis, the present study investigated the effects of acute stress on behavioural and electrophysiological measures of human attentional networks, and behavioural measures of working memory. Forty-five female participants (Mage = 22.1, SD = 2.4) performed the Attention Network Test (ANT) and the n-back task before and after the Maastricht Acute Stress Test (MAST; n = 23) or a non-stressful MAST-placebo (n = 22). Subjective distress ratings and salivary cortisol concentrations revealed a successful stress induction. Increased salivary cortisol at baseline was associated with slower reaction times across both tasks, suggesting a general detrimental effect of cortisol on cognitive functioning. Despite these findings, however, the hypothesised effects of the acute stress manipulation were not found for either task. Supplementary analyses indicated that these results were unrelated to the magnitude or duration of the stress response. Our results therefore suggest the standard version of the ANT may be insensitive to the effects of acute stress, and that higher cognitive loads may be necessary to observe stress effects on the n-back task.
ISSN:0031-9384
1873-507X
DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113602