Comparative efficacy of non-invasive neurostimulation therapies for poststroke dysphagia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
To explore the effect of non-invasive neurostimulation therapies on dysphagia patients after stroke. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane library databases until April 22, 2020. All published and unpublished randomized controlled trials (RCT) were i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neurophysiologie clinique 2021-12, Vol.51 (6), p.493-506 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To explore the effect of non-invasive neurostimulation therapies on dysphagia patients after stroke.
We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane library databases until April 22, 2020. All published and unpublished randomized controlled trials (RCT) were included. Full texts were independently reviewed. The risk of RCT bias was evaluated by two independent assessors using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The primary outcome measure was swallowing function before and after neurostimulation therapy. The effect sizes are calculated from the extracted data and combined into a comprehensive summary statistic.
A total of 27 randomized controlled trials were included in this study, involving 914 stroke patients (27 intervention groups and 20 control groups). Meta-analysis showed that compared with the control group, noninvasive neurostimulation therapies (repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation (sNMES) or pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES)) had a better effect (SMD = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.54–1.27; Z = 4.84; P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0987-7053 1769-7131 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.neucli.2021.02.006 |