Effects of varying illumination on ocular aberrations and aberration compensation before and after small incision Lenticule extraction: a prospective cohort study

Background There are few reports regarding the influence of varying illumination on the compensation effect before and after corneal refractive surgery. We aimed to evaluate the changes in refraction, higher-order aberrations, and aberration compensation between mesopic and photopic illumination bef...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC ophthalmology 2021-09, Vol.21 (1), p.1-336, Article 336
Hauptverfasser: Hao, Weiting, Wang, Yan, Cui, Tong, Ning, Wenxing, Zhu, Qing, Zhang, Yaohua
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background There are few reports regarding the influence of varying illumination on the compensation effect before and after corneal refractive surgery. We aimed to evaluate the changes in refraction, higher-order aberrations, and aberration compensation between mesopic and photopic illumination before and after small incision lenticule extraction. Methods In this prospective cohort study, only the right eyes of patients who underwent small incision lenticule extraction for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism at the Tianjin Eye Hospital were included. Wavefront refraction and higher-order aberrations were measured preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively under mesopic and photopic illumination. Compensation factors were calculated as 1 - (aberration of the whole eye/aberration of the anterior corneal surface). Results Forty patients undergoing small incision lenticule extraction were enrolled. All surgeries were completed without postoperative complications. Preoperatively, the eyes only had a statistically significantly higher (t = - 4.589, p < .001) spherical refractive error under mesopic vs. photopic illumination (median [interquartile range], - 6.146 [2.356] vs. - 6.030 [2.619] diopters [D]), whereas postoperatively, the eyes also exhibited statistically significantly higher (t = - 3.013, p = .005) astigmatism (- 0.608 [0.414] vs. - 0.382 [0.319] D). Differences in spherical refraction between the two illuminations were the highest in postoperative eyes (Delta > 0.5 D). Only postoperative eyes exhibited statistically significant elevations (t >= 4.081, p < .001) in higher-order aberrations under mesopic illumination, and only preoperative eyes exhibited statistically significantly enhanced (chi(2) = 6.373, p = .01 for fourth-order and chi(2) = 11.850, p = .001 for primary spherical aberrations) and decreased (chi(2) = 13.653, p = .001 for horizontal trefoil) compensation factors under mesopic illumination. Conclusions Exaggerations in higher-order aberrations and myopic shift after small incision lenticule extraction became apparent under mesopic illumination. Slight undercorrection may have an enhanced effect under low illumination and may reduce night vision. The specific changes in compensation effects in preoperative eyes may improve optical quality under mesopic illumination. Postoperative eyes have reduced compensation ability, specifically for spherical aberrations, under mesopic illumination, which may diminish night vision. Fur
ISSN:1471-2415
1471-2415
DOI:10.1186/s12886-021-02084-1