Addressing smoking in sheltered homelessness with intensive smoking treatment (ASSIST project): A pilot feasibility study of varenicline, combination nicotine replacement therapy and motivational interviewing

•Varenicline, NRT and MI is a feasible, safe, and effective.•Participants held concerns regarding varenicline safety and efficacy.•Counselling and NRT were viewed as acceptable strategies.•Education regarding varenicline safety is warranted. This pilot study aimed to test the feasibility of providin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Addictive behaviors 2022-01, Vol.124, p.107074-107074, Article 107074
Hauptverfasser: Skelton, Eliza, Lum, Alistair, Cooper, Lucy E., Barnett, Emma, Smith, Julie, Everson, Arlene, Machart, Jane, Baker, Amanda L., Halpin, Sean, Nielssen, Olav, Clapham, Matthew, Bonevski, Billie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Varenicline, NRT and MI is a feasible, safe, and effective.•Participants held concerns regarding varenicline safety and efficacy.•Counselling and NRT were viewed as acceptable strategies.•Education regarding varenicline safety is warranted. This pilot study aimed to test the feasibility of providing varenicline in combination with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and motivational interviewing (MI) to adult male smokers attending a clinic in a hostel for homeless people. A single group pre- and post-treatment (12 weeks following intervention commencement) design with embedded process evaluation (at weekly counselling and fortnightly safety check-ins). Participants were 20 male smokers attending a health clinic within a homelessness service in Sydney, Australia, between December 2019 and March 2020. Participants set a target quit date 7-days post intervention commencement. Adverse events, self-reported abstinence, cigarettes per day, treatment adherence and acceptability of the study interventions were assessed 12 weeks post intervention commencement. Abstinence was biochemically verified. Results are complete cases. Retention was 65% at 12-weeks post-intervention commencement (n = 13). No related adverse events were reported. Three participants (15%) reported continuous abstinence. Two participants self-reported 30-day point prevalence abstinence (10%), confirmed by CO level. Participants who did not quit smoking (n = 10), reported a significant reduction in the number of cigarettes smoked per day (19.4 vs 4.7, p 
ISSN:0306-4603
1873-6327
DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.107074