Is YouTube an adequate patient resource about orthodontic retention? A cross-sectional analysis of content and quality
The study aimed to evaluate the content and quality of information offered by YouTube for patients seeking information related to orthodontic retainers. YouTube was searched using the keyword “orthodontic retainers” from Google Trends. From the first 120 results, 97 videos were selected to be analyz...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics 2022-01, Vol.161 (1), p.e72-e79 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e79 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | e72 |
| container_title | American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics |
| container_volume | 161 |
| creator | Sezici, Yağmur Lena Gediz, Meltem Dindaroğlu, Furkan |
| description | The study aimed to evaluate the content and quality of information offered by YouTube for patients seeking information related to orthodontic retainers.
YouTube was searched using the keyword “orthodontic retainers” from Google Trends. From the first 120 results, 97 videos were selected to be analyzed. Videos were rated for quality by video information and quality index (VIQI) and the global quality scale (GQS). Videos were classified as low- and high-content groups using a 10-point score considering several retainer-related topics. Mann-Whitney U tests, chi-square tests, and Pearson correlation coefficients were used for statistical evaluations.
Most YouTube videos were uploaded by dentists/specialists (62.9%). We classified 12 videos as high content and 85 as low content. Instructions on the use of the orthodontic retainer was the most commonly covered topic (42.3%), followed by the effect on oral hygiene (38.1%), definition (37.1%), procedure of preparing orthodontic retainers (33.0%), and procedure of positioning (30.9%). A lower percentage of videos (6.2%) mentioned soft tissue irritation. The high-content video group had a significantly higher median value of GQS score and VIQI (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.12.023 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2572210802</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0889540621005254</els_id><sourcerecordid>2572210802</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4ed49c3c7b17878a1cec61d31a209067476b2d0935b15d6ac67748f86a84d70c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFqGzEQhkVpiB0nT1AoOvayzkjalXYPpYTQNoFALskhJ6GVxlRmvXIkbYPfps_SJ4scuz3mNDDz___wf4R8YrBkwOTlemnWwYUlB142fAlcfCBzBp2qpGr4RzKHtu2qpgY5I2cprQGgqzmckpmoG-iEgDl5uU30KUwPU4_UjNQ4fJ5MRro12eOYacQUpmjLsQ9TpiHmX-XnmL0tp1wUPozf6BW1MaRUJbT7hRlKlhl2yScaVtQW_T7LjO7vnxI_-Lw7JycrMyS8OM4Fefzx_eH6prq7_3l7fXVXWdF0uarR1Z0VVvVMtao1zKKVzAlmOHQgVa1kz13p0vSscdJYqVTdrlpp2topsGJBvhxytzE8T5iy3vhkcRjMiGFKmjeKcwZtgbcg4iB96xJxpbfRb0zcaQZ6T1yv9RtxvSeuGdfFVFyfjw-mfoPuv-cf4iL4ehBgqfnbY9TJFrQWnY8Fl3bBv_vgFX1ClSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2572210802</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is YouTube an adequate patient resource about orthodontic retention? A cross-sectional analysis of content and quality</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Sezici, Yağmur Lena ; Gediz, Meltem ; Dindaroğlu, Furkan</creator><creatorcontrib>Sezici, Yağmur Lena ; Gediz, Meltem ; Dindaroğlu, Furkan</creatorcontrib><description>The study aimed to evaluate the content and quality of information offered by YouTube for patients seeking information related to orthodontic retainers.
YouTube was searched using the keyword “orthodontic retainers” from Google Trends. From the first 120 results, 97 videos were selected to be analyzed. Videos were rated for quality by video information and quality index (VIQI) and the global quality scale (GQS). Videos were classified as low- and high-content groups using a 10-point score considering several retainer-related topics. Mann-Whitney U tests, chi-square tests, and Pearson correlation coefficients were used for statistical evaluations.
Most YouTube videos were uploaded by dentists/specialists (62.9%). We classified 12 videos as high content and 85 as low content. Instructions on the use of the orthodontic retainer was the most commonly covered topic (42.3%), followed by the effect on oral hygiene (38.1%), definition (37.1%), procedure of preparing orthodontic retainers (33.0%), and procedure of positioning (30.9%). A lower percentage of videos (6.2%) mentioned soft tissue irritation. The high-content video group had a significantly higher median value of GQS score and VIQI (P <0.001). The correlation between GQS and VIQI was strong (r = 0.698; P <0.01).
The content of YouTube videos for orthodontic retainers could not be considered as an adequate source of information for patients on orthodontic retainers. Most videos included instructions on the use of orthodontic retainers, but fewer videos mentioned the effect on speech performance and soft tissue irritations.
•YouTube is not currently an adequate source of information for orthodontic retainers.•Most YouTube videos about retainers were uploaded by a dentist or specialist.•The vast majority of the video contents were instructions on the use of retainers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-5406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.12.023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34509330</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies ; Humans ; Orthodontic Retainers ; Reproducibility of Results ; Social Media</subject><ispartof>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 2022-01, Vol.161 (1), p.e72-e79</ispartof><rights>2021 American Association of Orthodontists</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4ed49c3c7b17878a1cec61d31a209067476b2d0935b15d6ac67748f86a84d70c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4ed49c3c7b17878a1cec61d31a209067476b2d0935b15d6ac67748f86a84d70c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6009-1915</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.12.023$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34509330$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sezici, Yağmur Lena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gediz, Meltem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dindaroğlu, Furkan</creatorcontrib><title>Is YouTube an adequate patient resource about orthodontic retention? A cross-sectional analysis of content and quality</title><title>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</title><addtitle>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop</addtitle><description>The study aimed to evaluate the content and quality of information offered by YouTube for patients seeking information related to orthodontic retainers.
YouTube was searched using the keyword “orthodontic retainers” from Google Trends. From the first 120 results, 97 videos were selected to be analyzed. Videos were rated for quality by video information and quality index (VIQI) and the global quality scale (GQS). Videos were classified as low- and high-content groups using a 10-point score considering several retainer-related topics. Mann-Whitney U tests, chi-square tests, and Pearson correlation coefficients were used for statistical evaluations.
Most YouTube videos were uploaded by dentists/specialists (62.9%). We classified 12 videos as high content and 85 as low content. Instructions on the use of the orthodontic retainer was the most commonly covered topic (42.3%), followed by the effect on oral hygiene (38.1%), definition (37.1%), procedure of preparing orthodontic retainers (33.0%), and procedure of positioning (30.9%). A lower percentage of videos (6.2%) mentioned soft tissue irritation. The high-content video group had a significantly higher median value of GQS score and VIQI (P <0.001). The correlation between GQS and VIQI was strong (r = 0.698; P <0.01).
The content of YouTube videos for orthodontic retainers could not be considered as an adequate source of information for patients on orthodontic retainers. Most videos included instructions on the use of orthodontic retainers, but fewer videos mentioned the effect on speech performance and soft tissue irritations.
•YouTube is not currently an adequate source of information for orthodontic retainers.•Most YouTube videos about retainers were uploaded by a dentist or specialist.•The vast majority of the video contents were instructions on the use of retainers.</description><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Orthodontic Retainers</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Social Media</subject><issn>0889-5406</issn><issn>1097-6752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFqGzEQhkVpiB0nT1AoOvayzkjalXYPpYTQNoFALskhJ6GVxlRmvXIkbYPfps_SJ4scuz3mNDDz___wf4R8YrBkwOTlemnWwYUlB142fAlcfCBzBp2qpGr4RzKHtu2qpgY5I2cprQGgqzmckpmoG-iEgDl5uU30KUwPU4_UjNQ4fJ5MRro12eOYacQUpmjLsQ9TpiHmX-XnmL0tp1wUPozf6BW1MaRUJbT7hRlKlhl2yScaVtQW_T7LjO7vnxI_-Lw7JycrMyS8OM4Fefzx_eH6prq7_3l7fXVXWdF0uarR1Z0VVvVMtao1zKKVzAlmOHQgVa1kz13p0vSscdJYqVTdrlpp2topsGJBvhxytzE8T5iy3vhkcRjMiGFKmjeKcwZtgbcg4iB96xJxpbfRb0zcaQZ6T1yv9RtxvSeuGdfFVFyfjw-mfoPuv-cf4iL4ehBgqfnbY9TJFrQWnY8Fl3bBv_vgFX1ClSg</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Sezici, Yağmur Lena</creator><creator>Gediz, Meltem</creator><creator>Dindaroğlu, Furkan</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6009-1915</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>Is YouTube an adequate patient resource about orthodontic retention? A cross-sectional analysis of content and quality</title><author>Sezici, Yağmur Lena ; Gediz, Meltem ; Dindaroğlu, Furkan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4ed49c3c7b17878a1cec61d31a209067476b2d0935b15d6ac67748f86a84d70c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Orthodontic Retainers</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Social Media</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sezici, Yağmur Lena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gediz, Meltem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dindaroğlu, Furkan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sezici, Yağmur Lena</au><au>Gediz, Meltem</au><au>Dindaroğlu, Furkan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is YouTube an adequate patient resource about orthodontic retention? A cross-sectional analysis of content and quality</atitle><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop</addtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>161</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e72</spage><epage>e79</epage><pages>e72-e79</pages><issn>0889-5406</issn><eissn>1097-6752</eissn><abstract>The study aimed to evaluate the content and quality of information offered by YouTube for patients seeking information related to orthodontic retainers.
YouTube was searched using the keyword “orthodontic retainers” from Google Trends. From the first 120 results, 97 videos were selected to be analyzed. Videos were rated for quality by video information and quality index (VIQI) and the global quality scale (GQS). Videos were classified as low- and high-content groups using a 10-point score considering several retainer-related topics. Mann-Whitney U tests, chi-square tests, and Pearson correlation coefficients were used for statistical evaluations.
Most YouTube videos were uploaded by dentists/specialists (62.9%). We classified 12 videos as high content and 85 as low content. Instructions on the use of the orthodontic retainer was the most commonly covered topic (42.3%), followed by the effect on oral hygiene (38.1%), definition (37.1%), procedure of preparing orthodontic retainers (33.0%), and procedure of positioning (30.9%). A lower percentage of videos (6.2%) mentioned soft tissue irritation. The high-content video group had a significantly higher median value of GQS score and VIQI (P <0.001). The correlation between GQS and VIQI was strong (r = 0.698; P <0.01).
The content of YouTube videos for orthodontic retainers could not be considered as an adequate source of information for patients on orthodontic retainers. Most videos included instructions on the use of orthodontic retainers, but fewer videos mentioned the effect on speech performance and soft tissue irritations.
•YouTube is not currently an adequate source of information for orthodontic retainers.•Most YouTube videos about retainers were uploaded by a dentist or specialist.•The vast majority of the video contents were instructions on the use of retainers.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34509330</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.12.023</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6009-1915</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0889-5406 |
| ispartof | American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 2022-01, Vol.161 (1), p.e72-e79 |
| issn | 0889-5406 1097-6752 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2572210802 |
| source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
| subjects | Cross-Sectional Studies Humans Orthodontic Retainers Reproducibility of Results Social Media |
| title | Is YouTube an adequate patient resource about orthodontic retention? A cross-sectional analysis of content and quality |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A13%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20YouTube%20an%20adequate%20patient%20resource%20about%20orthodontic%20retention?%20A%20cross-sectional%20analysis%20of%20content%20and%C2%A0quality&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20orthodontics%20and%20dentofacial%20orthopedics&rft.au=Sezici,%20Ya%C4%9Fmur%20Lena&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=161&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e72&rft.epage=e79&rft.pages=e72-e79&rft.issn=0889-5406&rft.eissn=1097-6752&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.12.023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2572210802%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2572210802&rft_id=info:pmid/34509330&rft_els_id=S0889540621005254&rfr_iscdi=true |