Is YouTube an adequate patient resource about orthodontic retention? A cross-sectional analysis of content and quality
The study aimed to evaluate the content and quality of information offered by YouTube for patients seeking information related to orthodontic retainers. YouTube was searched using the keyword “orthodontic retainers” from Google Trends. From the first 120 results, 97 videos were selected to be analyz...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics 2022-01, Vol.161 (1), p.e72-e79 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The study aimed to evaluate the content and quality of information offered by YouTube for patients seeking information related to orthodontic retainers.
YouTube was searched using the keyword “orthodontic retainers” from Google Trends. From the first 120 results, 97 videos were selected to be analyzed. Videos were rated for quality by video information and quality index (VIQI) and the global quality scale (GQS). Videos were classified as low- and high-content groups using a 10-point score considering several retainer-related topics. Mann-Whitney U tests, chi-square tests, and Pearson correlation coefficients were used for statistical evaluations.
Most YouTube videos were uploaded by dentists/specialists (62.9%). We classified 12 videos as high content and 85 as low content. Instructions on the use of the orthodontic retainer was the most commonly covered topic (42.3%), followed by the effect on oral hygiene (38.1%), definition (37.1%), procedure of preparing orthodontic retainers (33.0%), and procedure of positioning (30.9%). A lower percentage of videos (6.2%) mentioned soft tissue irritation. The high-content video group had a significantly higher median value of GQS score and VIQI (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0889-5406 1097-6752 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.12.023 |