Clinical Impact of the Predict Prostate Risk Communication Tool in Men Newly Diagnosed with Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer: A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial
Predict Prostate is a freely available online personalised risk communication tool for men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Its accuracy has been assessed in multiple validation studies, but its clinical impact among patients has not hitherto been assessed. To assess the impact of the tool on pat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European urology 2021-11, Vol.80 (5), p.661-669 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Predict Prostate is a freely available online personalised risk communication tool for men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Its accuracy has been assessed in multiple validation studies, but its clinical impact among patients has not hitherto been assessed.
To assess the impact of the tool on patient decision-making and disease perception.
A multicentre randomised controlled trial was performed across eight UK centres among newly diagnosed men considering either active surveillance or radical treatment. A total of 145 patients were included between 2018 and 2020, with median age 67 yr (interquartile range [IQR] 61–72) and prostate-specific antigen 6.8 ng/ml (IQR 5.1–8.8).
Participants were randomised to either standard of care (SOC) information or SOC and a structured presentation of the Predict Prostate tool.
Validated questionnaires were completed by assessing the impact of the tool on decisional conflict, uncertainty, anxiety, and perception of survival.
Mean Decisional Conflict Scale scores were 26% lower in the Predict Prostate group (mean = 16.1) than in the SOC group (mean = 21.7; p = 0.027). Scores on the “support”, “uncertainty”, and “value clarity” subscales all favoured Predict Prostate (all p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0302-2838 1873-7560 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.08.001 |