Intra-Operative Abdominal Drain Placement for Gallbladder Cancer Surgery and Risk of Infectious Complications
Background: Routine intra-operative abdominal drain placement (IADP) is not beneficial for uncomplicated cholecystectomies though outcomes in gallbladder cancer surgery is unclear. This retrospective study hypothesized that patients with IADP (+IADP) for gallbladder cancer surgery have a higher risk...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical infections 2022-02, Vol.23 (1), p.22-28 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background:
Routine intra-operative abdominal drain placement (IADP) is not beneficial for uncomplicated cholecystectomies though outcomes in gallbladder cancer surgery is unclear. This retrospective study hypothesized that patients with IADP (+IADP) for gallbladder cancer surgery have a higher risk of post-operative infectious complications (PIC) compared with patients without IADP (−IADP).
Patients and Methods:
The 2014–2017 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried for +IADP and −IADP patients who had gallbladder cancer surgery. Post-operative infectious complications were defined as septic shock, organ/space infection (OSI), or percutaneous drainage. Multivariable analyses were performed to analyze the associated risk of PIC.
Results:
Of 385 patients, 237 (61.6%) were +IADP. The +IADP patients had higher rates of post-operative bile leak, OSI, re-admission, and increased length of stay (p 0.05). Bile leak (odds ratio [OR], 10.61; p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1096-2964 1557-8674 |
DOI: | 10.1089/sur.2021.149 |