Effect of elective neck dissection versus sentinel lymph node biopsy on shoulder morbidity and health-related quality of life in patients with oral cavity cancer: A longitudinal comparative cohort study

•Patients undergoing Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) have better short-term shoulder function.•Health-related Quality of life is comparable for SLNB and Elective Neck Dissection.•The short-term benefit in shoulder function strengthens the choice for the SLNB. To research the difference in shoulder...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oral oncology 2021-11, Vol.122, p.105510-105510, Article 105510
Hauptverfasser: van Hinte, Gerben, Sancak, Tolunay, Weijs, Willem L.J., Merkx, Matthias A.W., Leijendekkers, Ruud A., Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Maria W.G., Takes, Robert, Speksnijder, Caroline M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Patients undergoing Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) have better short-term shoulder function.•Health-related Quality of life is comparable for SLNB and Elective Neck Dissection.•The short-term benefit in shoulder function strengthens the choice for the SLNB. To research the difference in shoulder morbidity and health-related quality of life between patients with cT1-2N0 oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma that undergo either elective neck dissection (END) or a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) based approach of the neck. A longitudinal study with measurements before surgery, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery. Shoulder morbidity were determined with measurements of active range of motion of the shoulder and patient-reported outcomes for shoulder morbidity (SDQ, SPADI) and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) (EQ5D, EORTC-QLQ-HN35). Linear mixed model analyses were used to analyze differences over time between patients that had END, SLNB or SLNB followed by complementing neck dissection. We included 69 patients. Thirty-three patients were treated with END. Twenty-seven patients had SLNB without complementing neck dissection (SLNB), and nine were diagnosed lymph node positive followed by completion neck dissection (SLNB + ND). Ipsilateral shoulder abduction (P = .031) and forward flexion (P = .039) were significantly better for the SLNB group at 6 weeks post-intervention compared to the END and SLNB + ND group. No significant differences for shoulder morbidity, or health-related quality of life were found at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months between the three groups. With oncologic equivalence for the END and SLNB as strategies for the cN0 neck already demonstrated, and the SLNB being more cost-effective, our demonstrated benefit in short-term shoulder function strengthens the choice for the SLNB as a preferred treatment strategy.
ISSN:1368-8375
1879-0593
DOI:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105510