Goals of care communication and higher-value care for patients with advanced-stage cancer: A systematic review of the evidence

•We couldn’t derive a consensus definition of GOC communication topics, behaviors, timing, or anticipated outcomes.•Goals were most commonly descriptions of treatment outcomes rather than patients’ personal goals or alternative care goals.•The evidence that GOC communication between a clinician and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Patient education and counseling 2022-05, Vol.105 (5), p.1138-1151
Hauptverfasser: Cripe, Larry D., Vater, Laura B., Lilly, Jason A., Larimer, Angeline, Hoffmann, Mary Lynn, Frankel, Richard M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•We couldn’t derive a consensus definition of GOC communication topics, behaviors, timing, or anticipated outcomes.•Goals were most commonly descriptions of treatment outcomes rather than patients’ personal goals or alternative care goals.•The evidence that GOC communication between a clinician and patient leads to higher value cancer care toward the EOL is weak. Goals-of-care communication (GOCC) is recommended to increase the value of cancer care near the end of life (EOL). Conduct a systematic review of the evidence that GOCC is associated with higher-value care. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMB Reviews, CINAHL, and PsycInfo from inception to July 2019. We analyzed the population,design, and results and the authors’ definitions of GOCC. Risk of bias was assessed. Thirty-two articles were selected. Ten articles reported results from 8 interventions; 17 characterized participants’ perspectives; and 5 were retrospective The topics, behaviors, timing, and anticipated outcomes of GOCC varied significantly and were indistinguishable from practices such as advance care planning. GOCC typically focused on treatment outcomes rather than patients’ goals. Four of 5 interventions increased evidence of GOCC after clinician training. Only one reported improved patient outcomes. No consensus exists about what GOCC entails. There is limited evidence that GOCC increases the value of EOL care. Future studies should focus on how to engage patients in conversations about their personal goals and integrate their goals into care planning. Clinicians can encourage GOCC by explaining how patients’ goals influence decisions especially as treatment options become limited.
ISSN:0738-3991
1873-5134
DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2021.08.016