The Influence of Cesarean Delivery on Ovarian Reserve: a Prospective Cohort Study

To assess the association between cesarean delivery and ovarian reserve, as compared to vaginal delivery. A prospective case control study conducted at a single tertiary medical center between June 2018 and June 2019. Study population included women with singleton pregnancy that underwent first cesa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) Calif.), 2022-02, Vol.29 (2), p.639-645
Hauptverfasser: Mohr-Sasson, Aya, Haas, Jigal, Bar-Adon, Sonya, Shats, Maya, Hochman, Roni, Orvieto, Raoul, Mazaki-Tovi, Shali, Sivan, Eyal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To assess the association between cesarean delivery and ovarian reserve, as compared to vaginal delivery. A prospective case control study conducted at a single tertiary medical center between June 2018 and June 2019. Study population included women with singleton pregnancy that underwent first cesarean delivery that were compared to women undergoing normal vaginal delivery. Women with low ovarian reserve, endometriosis, previous pelvic surgery, chronic maternal disease, and active labor were excluded. Ovarian reserve was estimated by Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels that was determined twice for each participant: up to a week before and 3 months after delivery. Primary outcome was defined as the delta in AMH levels. Data were analyzed by non-parametric tests. During the study period, 135 women were enrolled, of them 63 (47%) underwent cesarean delivery and 72 (53%) had vaginal delivery. Women in the cesarean delivery group were older (34 (31–38) vs. 32 (29–35); p  = 0.001); nevertheless, AMH levels measured before delivery were comparable between the two groups (0.92 (0.51–1.79) vs. 0.95 (0.51–1.79) pg/mL; p  = 0.42). AMH levels measured after delivery were more than doubled in the study and control groups (2.15 (1.24–3.05) vs. 2.62 (1.05–5.09); p  = 0.50), and delta AMH levels were also found comparable (1.25 (0.61–2.22) vs. 1.59 (0.63–3.41), respectively; p  = 0.43). Linear regression analysis including age, mode of delivery, gestational age at delivery, and delta hemoglobin levels revealed that only maternal age was significantly associated with delta in AMH levels ( B  =  − 0.09, p  = 0.04). Cesarean delivery does not decrease ovarian reserve as estimated by AMH.
ISSN:1933-7191
1933-7205
DOI:10.1007/s43032-021-00730-z