Myths and facts about getting an academic faculty position in neuroscience
Prior funding and/or papers in high-profile journals are not necessary to obtain a tenure-track faculty position. We at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke routinely receive questions and statements from trainees and faculty that suggest widespread beliefs about the necessity...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Science advances 2021-08, Vol.7 (35) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Prior funding and/or papers in high-profile journals are not necessary to obtain a tenure-track faculty position.
We at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke routinely receive questions and statements from trainees and faculty that suggest widespread beliefs about the necessity of a National Institutes of Health K99/R00 award, other prior funding, and/or specific types of publications for obtaining one’s first tenure-track position in neuroscience. To address these beliefs, we examined the funding and publication history of a cohort of investigators who began their first academic faculty position between 2009 and 2019, and we interviewed several senior academic leaders with extensive experience in hiring new faculty. Our data show that |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2375-2548 2375-2548 |
DOI: | 10.1126/sciadv.abj2604 |