Can occurrence of convulsive status epilepticus during video telemetry be predicted? Observations from an epilepsy monitoring unit

•Convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) is a rare but treatable adverse event in EMU.•Prior SE is a strong predictor & rhythmic interictal spike-waves a weak predictor.•Lower risk is noted with prior daily seizures & if >2 events occur without CSE.•The number of ongoing ASM and tapering regi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Epilepsy & behavior 2021-10, Vol.123, p.108252-108252, Article 108252
Hauptverfasser: Baishya, Jitupam, Menon, Ramshekhar N., Ravish Keni, R., Saraf, Udit U., Varma, Ravi Prasad, Radhakrishnan, Ashalatha, Cherian, Ajith, Thomas, Sanjeev V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) is a rare but treatable adverse event in EMU.•Prior SE is a strong predictor & rhythmic interictal spike-waves a weak predictor.•Lower risk is noted with prior daily seizures & if >2 events occur without CSE.•The number of ongoing ASM and tapering regimen do not predispose to CSE. The objective of the study was to evaluate the frequency, clinical, and video-electroencephalographic (VEEG) predictors of convlusive status epilepticus (CSE) in the epilepsy-monitoring unit (EMU). The data of all patients who had CSE in our EMU between 2008 and 2017 were reviewed. For each case, two age- and diagnosis-matched subjects who underwent VEEG and did not develop CSE were taken as internal controls. Electro-clinical data of both the groups were compared. Predictors of CSE were assessed using logistic regression analysis. Out of 11,188 video-telemetries were conducted between 2008-17, forty-three events of CSE (0.38%) were recorded. On comparisons with 86 internal controls no differences were apparent on prevalence of cognitive impairment, structural lesion, number of baseline anti-seizure medications (ASM), ASM taper schedule, ictal patterns, and duration of VEEG monitoring. Inter-ictal rhythmic periodic patterns had significantly higher prevalence in cases (p = 0.028). Logistic regression analysis revealed that odds of CSE were higher with past history of SE [p = 0.008; adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 5.48 (confidence intervals {CI} 1.55–19.28)] and in presence of rhythmic spike and wave discharges [p = 0.016, OR = 33.518(CI = 1.93–581.4)]; the odds were lower if the first two seizures recorded did not evolve into CSE [p = 0.009, OR = 0.247 (CI = 0.08–0.70)] and if there was prior history of daily seizures [p = 0.02, OR = 0.250 (CI = 0.07–0.84)]. CSE is a rare yet important adverse event in EMU. Clinical predictors are more relevant in comparison to EEG variables. Extent of ASM withdrawal may not directly account for occurrence of CSE; factors inherent to a patient’s epilepsy are deterministic.
ISSN:1525-5050
1525-5069
DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108252