Effectiveness of treatment for hepatitis C virus reinfection following direct acting antiviral therapy in the REACH-C cohort

•Treatment for post-DAA reinfection was highly effective (95% individuals with known treatment outcomes were cured).•Treatment for reinfection can be delivered across primary, tertiary and prison settings.•Retaining people who inject drugs in care represents an ongoing challenge for confirmation of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The International journal of drug policy 2021-10, Vol.96, p.103422-103422, Article 103422
Hauptverfasser: Carson, Joanne M., Hajarizadeh, Behzad, Hanson, Josh, O'Beirne, James, Iser, David, Read, Phillip, Balcomb, Anne, Davies, Jane, Doyle, Joseph S., Yee, Jasmine, Martinello, Marianne, Marks, Philippa, Dore, Gregory J., Matthews, Gail V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Treatment for post-DAA reinfection was highly effective (95% individuals with known treatment outcomes were cured).•Treatment for reinfection can be delivered across primary, tertiary and prison settings.•Retaining people who inject drugs in care represents an ongoing challenge for confirmation of cure testing. Direct acting antiviral (DAA) therapy is highly effective for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, but reinfection following treatment may compromise benefits of cure. This study assessed the real-world effectiveness of treatment for reinfection. Real-world effectiveness of antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis C (REACH-C) is an observational study evaluating treatment outcomes following sequential DAA initiations across 33 health services in Australia between March 2016-June 2019. Reinfection was defined by post-treatment genotype switch or HCV viraemia after sustained virologic response (SVR12). Of the 10,843 individuals initiating DAA therapy post-treatment viraemia was reported in 526 of whom 99 were reinfections. Treatment for reinfection occurred in 88 individuals. In those with available treatment outcomes, SVR12 was similar to initial treatment in the overall REACH-C cohort (95% vs 95%; p = 0.745) and comparable across primary, tertiary, and prison settings. Classifying unknown treatment outcomes as failures, SVR12 for treatment of reinfection was lower than initial treatment in REACH-C (67% vs 81%; p = 0.002), due to higher lost to follow-up. Treatment of reinfection is highly effective and can be delivered in non-specialist settings. Access to treatment for reinfection in high-risk populations is crucial to HCV elimination.
ISSN:0955-3959
1873-4758
DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103422