Sensorimotor tongue evaluation and rehabilitation in patients with sleep‐disordered breathing: a novel approach

Study objectives To evaluate tone, apraxia and stereognosis dysfunctions in patients with SDB compared with healthy controls, and to monitor the effectiveness of Airway Gym® as an easy‐to‐use myofunctional therapy (MT) modality in terms of the tongue's motor and sensory responses, comparing res...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of oral rehabilitation 2021-12, Vol.48 (12), p.1363-1372
Hauptverfasser: Rodríguez‐Alcalá, Laura, Martínez, Juan Martín‐Lagos, Baptista, Peter, Ríos Fernández, Raquel, Javier Gómez, Francisco, Parejo Santaella, Jesús, Plaza, Guillermo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Study objectives To evaluate tone, apraxia and stereognosis dysfunctions in patients with SDB compared with healthy controls, and to monitor the effectiveness of Airway Gym® as an easy‐to‐use myofunctional therapy (MT) modality in terms of the tongue's motor and sensory responses, comparing results before and after therapy. Methods This was a prospective, non‐randomised pilot study of 25 patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnoea‐hypopnoea syndrome (OSAHS), 25 patients with primary snoring (PS) and 20 healthy controls. Qualitative and quantitative instruments—Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI), lingual apraxia and stereognosis tests were used to assess tongue sensorimotor function. Results 22 patients with PS, 21 with OSAHS and all 20 controls ended the therapy. In OSAHS, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale score decreased from 16 ± 7.3 to 12 ± 4.5 after therapy (p = 0.53). In PS and OSAHS groups, the IOPI scores increased significantly. These measures did not change significantly in the controls. Lingual apraxia testing showed that controls performed all the manoeuvres, whereas PS 5.6 ± 1.4 and OSAHS 4.5 ± 1.9 (p = 0.14). In the stereognosis test, the mean number of figures recognised was 2.6 ± 2.2 in OSAHS, 3.3±1.2 in PS and 5.7±0.9 in control group (p 
ISSN:0305-182X
1365-2842
DOI:10.1111/joor.13247