Acetabular reconstruction in oncological surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of implant survivorship and patient outcomes
Reconstruction of the hip for peri-acetabular oncological disease remains a challenge. The objective of this study was to summarize the evidence and identify techniques utilized for primary and metastatic tumors of the acetabulum and hemipelvis. A systematic review of the published literature was ca...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical oncology 2021-09, Vol.38, p.101635-101635, Article 101635 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Reconstruction of the hip for peri-acetabular oncological disease remains a challenge. The objective of this study was to summarize the evidence and identify techniques utilized for primary and metastatic tumors of the acetabulum and hemipelvis.
A systematic review of the published literature was carried out in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases identified relevant articles. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The study was registered on PROSPERO.
53 papers were included, 16 were suitable for meta-analysis. 909 patients had primary and 1140 metastatic disease. 1094 patients underwent reconstruction with conventional total hip arthroplasty (with or without cup-cage or cement augmentation) or modifications of the Harrington procedure, collectively termed ‘non-complex’. 928 patients underwent ‘complex’ reconstructions with either a modular hemipelvic, saddle, reverse snow-cone, custom-made or 3D-printed endoprosthesis. The most common complication was deep infection (11%) followed by dislocation (5%). Mean MSTS scores were 61.9% for ‘non-complex’ versus 63.2% for ‘complex’ reconstruction. Meta-analysis suggested increased mortality for primary (OR 3.14; 95% CI 1.15–8.54) and trends toward reduced mortality for metastatic disease (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.26–3.29) following ‘complex’ versus ‘non-complex’ reconstruction. Reoperation rates were higher following ‘complex’ reconstruction for metastatic disease (OR 1.90; 95% CI 0.66–5.46) and similar for primary disease (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.45–2.14).
Peri-acetabular tumors are associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Decisions regarding implant selection are multi-factorial with recent increase in the use of custom-made and 3D-printing technologies. Multiple factors contribute to the oncological outcome and patient function. Further research is required in order to guide optimal practice.
●Peri-acetabular tumors are associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality●Multiple reconstructive options for primary and metastatic periacetabular tumors●Custom and 3D-printing technology has increased in recent years●Trend towards lower mortality for metastatic disease using custom implants●Rapidly developing field in Orthopedic Oncology |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0960-7404 1879-3320 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101635 |