Corticosteroid administration for cancer-related indications is an unfavorable prognostic factor in solid cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment
•The correlation between corticosteroid administration and ICI efficacy is investigated by a meta and retrospective study.•Corticosteroid administration for cancer-related indications is negatively correlated with ICI efficacy in solid cancer patients.•Corticosteroid administration for non-cancer in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International immunopharmacology 2021-10, Vol.99, p.108031-108031, Article 108031 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •The correlation between corticosteroid administration and ICI efficacy is investigated by a meta and retrospective study.•Corticosteroid administration for cancer-related indications is negatively correlated with ICI efficacy in solid cancer patients.•Corticosteroid administration for non-cancer indications or irAEs is unrelated with ICI efficacy in solid cancer patients.•Careful selection of corticosteroid-treated patients for ICI therapy is necessary.
Immunotherapies targeting immune checkpoints have achieved encouraging survival benefits in patients with various solid cancers. Corticosteroids are frequently administrated for cancer/non-cancer related indications and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This study aimed to clarify the prognostic significance of corticosteroid administration in solid cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment.
First, a meta-analysis was performed using the literatures searched from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, and Clinicaltrials.gov before January 2021. The Hazard ratios (HRs) coupled with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate the correlation of corticosteroid administration with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Then, a retrospective analysis enrolling 118 ICI-treated cancer patients was performed for validation, among which 26 patients received corticosteroids for cancer-related indications.
In the meta-analysis, corticosteroid administration for cancer-related indications was significantly correlated with worse PFS (HR = 1.735(1.381–2.180)) and OS (HR = 1.936(1.587–2.361)) of the ICI-treated patients. However, corticosteroid administration for non-cancer-related indications and irAEs was unrelated with PFS (non-cancer-related indications: HR = 0.830(0.645–1.067); irAEs: HR = 1.302(0.628–2.696)) and OS (non-cancer-related indications: HR = 0.786(0.512–1.206); irAEs: HR = 1.107(0.832–1.474)) of the ICI-treated patients. The following retrospective analysis identified corticosteroid administration for cancer-related indications was an independent unfavorable predictor for PFS (P = 0.006) and OS (P = 0.044) of the ICI-treated patients. The subgroup analysis based on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) demonstrated the similar results (P = 0.002 for PFS and P = 0.047 for OS).
Our study demonstrated corticosteroid administration for cancer-related indications is an unfavorable prognostic factor in solid cancer patients receiving ICI tre |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1567-5769 1878-1705 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.108031 |