Validity of the Urinary Symptom Questionnaires for people with neurogenic bladder (USQNB) who void or use indwelling catheters
Study Design Descriptive Psychometrics Study Objectives Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD), or “neurogenic bladder” is a common and disruptive condition for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) and disease (including multiple sclerosis, MS). Our team has developed patient-center...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Spinal cord 2021-09, Vol.59 (9), p.948-958 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Study Design
Descriptive Psychometrics Study
Objectives
Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD), or “neurogenic bladder” is a common and disruptive condition for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) and disease (including multiple sclerosis, MS). Our team has developed patient-centered instruments of urinary symptoms specific to patients with NLUTD, across bladder management methods. Validity evidence is needed to support the use of two new instruments, Urinary Symptom Questionnaires for people with Neurogenic Bladder (USQNB) for those who manage their bladder with indwelling catheters (IDC), or who void (V).
Setting
Online surveys completed by individuals in the United States with NLUTD due to either SCI or MS who manage their bladder with indwelling catheters (SCI,
n
= 306; MS, n = 8), or by voiding (SCI,
n
= 103; MS,
n
= 383). A total of
n
= 381 USQNB-IDC respondents (five control groups), and 351 USQNB-V respondents (four control groups), contributed to our convergent and divergent validity evidence.
Methods
Data were collected online to estimate key aspects of psychometric validity (
content
, reflection of the construct to be measured;
face
, recognizability of the contents as representing the construct to be measured;
structural
, the extent to which the instrument captures recognizable dimensions of the construct to be measured).
Divergent
and
convergent
validity evidence was derived from multiple control groups, while evidence of
criterion
validity was derived from attribution of each item to their experience “with a UTI”.
Results
Evidence of face, content, criterion, convergent, and divergent validity was compiled for each instrument.
Conclusions
The instruments demonstrate adequate, multi-dimensional, validity evidence to recommend their use for decision-making by patients, clinicians, and researchers. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1362-4393 1476-5624 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41393-021-00666-w |