Feasibility and safety of the posterior retroperitoneoscopic approach in the resection of aortocaval and infrarenal paraganglioma: a single-center experience

Background The posterior retroperitoneoscopic approach (PRA) has been under attention as a method for resection of paraganglioma (PGL) for the past few years. However, only a few studies have explored the effectiveness and safety of the PRA for aortocaval and infrarenal PGL resection. Methods We des...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 2021-12, Vol.35 (12), p.7246-7252
Hauptverfasser: Choi, Soon Min, Choi, Sun Hyung, Choi, Hye Ryeon, Kim, Jin Kyong, Lee, Cho Rok, Lee, Jandee, Jeong, Jong Ju, Nam, Kee-Hyun, Chung, Woong Youn, Kang, Sang-Wook
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The posterior retroperitoneoscopic approach (PRA) has been under attention as a method for resection of paraganglioma (PGL) for the past few years. However, only a few studies have explored the effectiveness and safety of the PRA for aortocaval and infrarenal PGL resection. Methods We designed this retrospective study to investigate the safety and effectiveness of the PRA for aortocaval and infrarenal PGL resection in a single center. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent PRA for PGL resection at our medical center from January 2006 to March 2021. Eight patients were enrolled, of whom six had aortocaval PGL. We investigated the surgical outcomes of enrolled patients. Results The locations of the tumors in relation to the renal vein were: suprarenal in two (25.0%) patients, at the renal vein level in three (37.5%) patients, and infrarenal in three (37.5%) patients. The mean operative time of the enrolled patients was 101.5 ± 39.1 min. The mean postoperative stay was 3.5 ± 1.5 days, and the estimated blood loss was 31.3 ± 51.4 ml. There was one minor complication (chyle leakage), and two hypotensive events occurred during the surgery. Focusing on the results of the renal vein level and infrarenal PGL resection, the mean operative time, mean postoperative stay, and estimated blood loss of the patients were 109.2 ± 41.3 min, 3.5 ± 1.8 days, and 41.7 ± 56.4 ml, respectively. Conclusion The PRA for aortocaval and infrarenal PGL resection is feasible and safe. Additional data analysis and long-term follow-up are needed in the future.
ISSN:0930-2794
1432-2218
DOI:10.1007/s00464-021-08662-0