High initial graft tension increases external tibial rotation on the axial plane after anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Purpose The purpose of this study was to clarify the effects of applying different amounts of initial graft tension on the femorotibial positional relationship on the axial plane after anatomical ACL reconstruction. Methods Eighty patients who underwent isolated ACL reconstructions using bone–patell...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2022-07, Vol.142 (7), p.1597-1604
Hauptverfasser: Tahara, Keitaro, Yamagami, Ryota, Taketomi, Shuji, Inui, Hiroshi, Tanaka, Sakae
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose The purpose of this study was to clarify the effects of applying different amounts of initial graft tension on the femorotibial positional relationship on the axial plane after anatomical ACL reconstruction. Methods Eighty patients who underwent isolated ACL reconstructions using bone–patellar tendon–bone grafts were included in this study. In 40 of the 80 patients, the grafts were fixed at full knee extension with maximum manual force (high graft tension; Group H), whereas in the other 40 patients, the grafts were fixed at full knee extension with force of 80 N (low graft tension; Group L). One week postoperatively, all patients underwent computed tomography (CT) on bilateral knee joints with knee extension. The femorotibial positional relationship in axial CT images were retrospectively evaluated. Side-to-side differences (the surgical side minus the unaffected side) were calculated in these variables. Results The side-to-side differences in anterior tibial translation distances were − 1.8 ± 2.1 mm in Group H and − 1.9 ± 2.0 mm in Group L, with no significant difference between the two groups. The side-to-side differences in tibial lateral shifts were − 0.2 ± 1.5 mm in Group H and 0.0 ± 1.4 mm in Group L, with no significant difference between the two groups. The side-to-side differences in tibial external rotation angles were 2.7 ± 4.5° in Group H and 0.3 ± 3.3° in Group L, with a significant difference between the two groups ( P  
ISSN:1434-3916
0936-8051
1434-3916
DOI:10.1007/s00402-021-04098-2