QUiC Clinics in the Central Texas Market: Value-Based Primary Care in Military Medicine
ABSTRACT Introduction For the past 16 years, Military Health System primary care providers have been incentivized to pursue work in a fee-for-service (FFS) model. The system values documentation of productivity to earn as many relative value units as possible. The result is densely packed clinic sch...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Military medicine 2023-01, Vol.188 (1-2), p.e343-e350 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | ABSTRACT
Introduction
For the past 16 years, Military Health System primary care providers have been incentivized to pursue work in a fee-for-service (FFS) model. The system values documentation of productivity to earn as many relative value units as possible. The result is densely packed clinic schedules that often lack the space or flexibility to accommodate patients when sick. Leakage ensues. Furthermore, prevention and patient experience are not directly incentivized.
Methods
The Central Texas Market’s Accountable Care Organization reformed incentives in its #5 FFS-designed community-based medical homes to value outcomes over productivity. The resulting quality, urgent, internet, and phone care (QUiC) clinics are value-based and, therefore, better structured to achieve the Quad aim (better care, better health/readiness, and low cost). Forsaking deeply ingrained FFS practices, QUiC clinics funnel all routine (information-sharing) appointments into efficient internet or phone appointments. With the time freed by managing common needs in short bursts, QUiC clinics see sick patients with no notice (urgent care). They also focus on prevention and patient experience. We measured the effectiveness of the QUiC clinics in the value-based metrics of (1) patient experience, (2) Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set measures of quality and prevention. (3) access-to-care, (4) leakage, and (5) enrollment.
Results
Over a 19 month period, the five community-based medical homes improved significantly in all areas. Specifically, measures of patient satisfaction improved from the mid-80s percent satisfied to the mid-90s percent satisfied. Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set measures increased from average compared to national benchmarks ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0026-4075 1930-613X |
DOI: | 10.1093/milmed/usab321 |