Comparison of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Classifying of Home Discharge Possibility in Convalescent Stroke Patients: A Secondary Analysis

Classifying the possibility of home discharge is important during stroke rehabilitation to support decision-making. There have been several studies on supervised machine learning algorithms, but only a few have compared the performance of different algorithms based on the same dataset for the classi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases 2021-10, Vol.30 (10), p.106011-106011, Article 106011
Hauptverfasser: Imura, Takeshi, Toda, Haruki, Iwamoto, Yuji, Inagawa, Tetsuji, Imada, Naoki, Tanaka, Ryo, Inoue, Yu, Araki, Hayato, Araki, Osamu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Classifying the possibility of home discharge is important during stroke rehabilitation to support decision-making. There have been several studies on supervised machine learning algorithms, but only a few have compared the performance of different algorithms based on the same dataset for the classification of home discharge possibility. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate five supervised machine learning algorithms for the classification of home discharge possibility in stroke patients. This was a secondary analysis based on the data of 481 stroke patients from the database of our institution. Five models developed by supervised machine learning algorithms, including decision tree (DT), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF) were compared by constructing a classification system based on the same dataset. Several parameters including classification accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), and F1 score (a weighted average of precision and recall) were used for model evaluation. The k-NN model had the best classification accuracy (84.0%) with a moderate AUC (0.88) and F1 score (87.8). The SVM model also showed high classification accuracy (82.6%) along with the highest AUC (0.91), sensitivity (94.4), negative predictive value (87.5), and negative likelihood ratio (0.088). The DT, LDA, and RF models had high classification accuracies (≥ 79.9%) with moderate AUCs (≥ 0.84) and F1 scores (≥ 83.8). Regarding model performance, the k-NN and SVM seemed the best candidate algorithms for classifying the possibility of home discharge in stroke patients.
ISSN:1052-3057
1532-8511
DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106011