Communication research at the National Cancer Institute, 2013–2019: a grant portfolio analysis

Purpose To analyze communication-focused grants funded by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) between fiscal years 2013 and 2019 to provide insight into the characteristics of funded projects and identify promising areas for future research. Methods iSearch, a portfolio analysis tool, was queried to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer causes & control 2021-12, Vol.32 (12), p.1333-1345
Hauptverfasser: Gaysynsky, Anna, Rising, Camella J., Trivedi, Neha, Blake, Kelly D., Chou, Wen-Ying Sylvia, Oh, April, Vanderpool, Robin C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To analyze communication-focused grants funded by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) between fiscal years 2013 and 2019 to provide insight into the characteristics of funded projects and identify promising areas for future research. Methods iSearch, a portfolio analysis tool, was queried to identify communication-related grants funded by NCI. Abstracts and specific aims were coded for key study characteristics. 344 unique competing grants with a substantial communication component were included in the final analysis. SAS version 9.4 was used to calculate code frequencies. Results Most communication grants focused on cancer prevention ( n  = 197), with fewer targeting diagnosis, treatment, survivorship, or end-of-life. Tobacco product use was the most frequently addressed topic ( n  = 128). Most grants targeted or measured outcomes at the individual ( n  = 332) or interpersonal level ( n  = 127). Cancer patients/survivors ( n  = 101) and healthcare providers ( n  = 63) were often the population of focus, while caregivers or those at increased risk for cancer received less attention. Studies were often based in healthcare settings ( n  = 125); few studies were based in schools or worksites. Many grants employed randomized controlled trials ( n  = 168), but more novel methods, like optimization trials, were uncommon. Conclusion NCI’s support of health communication research covers a diverse array of topics, populations, and methods. However, the current analysis also points to several promising opportunities for future research, including efforts focused on communication at later stages of the cancer control continuum and at multiple levels of influence, as well as studies that take advantage of a greater diversity of settings and leverage novel methodological approaches.
ISSN:0957-5243
1573-7225
DOI:10.1007/s10552-021-01481-7