A nationwide register‐study of healthcare utilisation in the year preceding a colorectal cancer recurrence diagnosis

Objective To analyse healthcare utilisation in colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors in the 12 months preceding a diagnosis of CRC recurrence. Methods This register‐based cohort study included curatively treated survivors of CRC diagnosed in 2008–2018. Survivors with CRC recurrence were matched 1:5 with...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of cancer care 2021-11, Vol.30 (6), p.e13494-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Rasmussen, Linda Aagaard, Jensen, Henry, Falborg, Alina Zalounina, Iversen, Lene Hjerrild, Vedsted, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To analyse healthcare utilisation in colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors in the 12 months preceding a diagnosis of CRC recurrence. Methods This register‐based cohort study included curatively treated survivors of CRC diagnosed in 2008–2018. Survivors with CRC recurrence were matched 1:5 with recurrence‐free survivors. We estimated the monthly frequency of healthcare utilisation before the recurrence diagnosis and a corresponding index date assigned to the matched population. A regression model was used to compare healthcare utilisation between groups. Results We included 3045 survivors with recurrence and 15,225 recurrence‐free survivors. At study entry, both groups had on average one contact per month to general practice. Compared with recurrence‐free survivors, survivors with recurrence had more contacts to general practice from 10 months before the diagnosis and more haemoglobin measurements from 4 months before the diagnosis. They had more contacts to hospitals and follow‐up clinics from 7 months before the diagnosis and more diagnostic investigations from 2 months before the diagnosis. Conclusion General practitioners have regular contact with CRC survivors and are involved in detecting recurrence. The increased number of contacts in the months before the rise in diagnostic investigations indicates an opportunity to expedite referral to diagnostics and the diagnosis of CRC recurrence.
ISSN:0961-5423
1365-2354
DOI:10.1111/ecc.13494