Electronic charting of radiation therapy planning and treatment: Report of Task Group 262

While most Radiation Oncology clinics have adopted electronic charting in one form or another, no consensus document exists that provides guidelines for safe and effective use of the Radiation Oncology electronic medical records (RO‐EMR). Task Group 262 was formed to provide these guidelines as well...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2021-11, Vol.48 (11), p.e927-e968
Hauptverfasser: Mechalakos, James G., Dieterich, Sonja, Fong de los Santos, Luis E., Fontenla, Sandra C., Hanley, Joseph, Harwalkar, Vijay A., Hong, Linda X., Huang, Y. Jessica, Kim, Grace Gwe‐Ya, Richardson, Susan L., Sutlief, Steven G., Yaddanapudi, Sridhar, Merkel, Sue, Parry, Mark
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:While most Radiation Oncology clinics have adopted electronic charting in one form or another, no consensus document exists that provides guidelines for safe and effective use of the Radiation Oncology electronic medical records (RO‐EMR). Task Group 262 was formed to provide these guidelines as well as to provide recommendations to vendors for improving electronic charting functionality in future. Guidelines are provided in the following areas: Implementation and training for the RO‐EMR, acceptance testing and quality assurance (QA) of the RO‐EMR, use of the RO‐EMR as an information repository, use of the RO‐EMR as a workflow manager, electronic charting for brachytherapy and nonstandard treatments, and information technology (IT) considerations associated with the RO‐EMR. The report was based on a literature search by the task group, an extensive survey of task group members on their respective RO‐EMR practices, an AAPM membership survey on electronic charting, as well as group consensus.
ISSN:0094-2405
2473-4209
DOI:10.1002/mp.15116