Is Splenic Hilar Lymph Node Dissection Without Splenectomy Essential for Proximal Advanced Gastric Cancer?

Background The standard surgery for proximal advanced gastric cancer (PAGC) is total gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection (LND). Although prophylactic splenectomy for splenic hilar LND (No. 10) is not recommended due to any survival advantage, prophylactic LND (No. 10) without splenectomy remai...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgical oncology 2021-12, Vol.28 (13), p.8952-8961
Hauptverfasser: Oh, Yoon Jung, Kim, Deok Hee, Eom, Bang Wool, Yoon, Hong Man, Kim, Young-Woo, Ryu, Keun Won
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The standard surgery for proximal advanced gastric cancer (PAGC) is total gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection (LND). Although prophylactic splenectomy for splenic hilar LND (No. 10) is not recommended due to any survival advantage, prophylactic LND (No. 10) without splenectomy remains controversial. Thus, we aimed to evaluate whether No. 10 LND is essential for patients’ survival benefit in PAGC. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of 1038 patients with PAGC who underwent total gastrectomy without splenectomy. After adjusting for confounders and propensity score matching (PSM), patients were grouped into Group 1 (D2 LND without splenic hilar LN; n  = 288) or Group 2 (D2 LND with splenic hilar LN; n  = 288). Variables between the two groups (5-year overall survival [OS] and disease-free survival [DFS]) were compared, as well as in patients with tumors located in the greater curvature and those with Borrmann type IV disease. Results The 5-year OS and DFS rates after PSM were not significantly different between Groups 1 and 2 (57.3% vs. 62.1%, p  = 0.300; 52.8% vs. 59.7%, p  = 0.100, respectively). Furthermore, the 5-year OS and DFS rates in patients with greater curvature involvement (54.4% vs. 61.9%, p  = 0.500; 50.0% vs. 57.6%, p  = 0.400, respectively) and Borrmann type IV disease (23.8% vs. 38.6%, p  = 0.400; 16.7% vs. 33.9%, p  = 0.200, respectively) after PSM were also not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions Prophylactic splenic hilar LND without splenectomy does not improve long-term survival in PAGC. Therefore, this procedure might not be essential for patients with PAGC as well greater curvature involvement and Borrmann type IV disease.
ISSN:1068-9265
1534-4681
DOI:10.1245/s10434-021-10354-x