Asthma patients' and physicians’ perspectives on the burden and management of asthma

The 2021 Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) report recommends as-needed inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/formoterol irrespective of severity, and maintenance and reliever treatment (MART) from GINA Step 3 as part of Treatment Track 1, partly based on the SYGMA studies. We investigated how current clini...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Respiratory medicine 2021-09, Vol.186, p.106524-106524, Article 106524
Hauptverfasser: Chapman, Kenneth R., An, Li, Bosnic-Anticevich, Sinthia, Campomanes, Celeste M., Espinosa, Jerónimo, Jain, Priya, Lavoie, Kim L., Li, Jing, Butta, Aman K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The 2021 Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) report recommends as-needed inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/formoterol irrespective of severity, and maintenance and reliever treatment (MART) from GINA Step 3 as part of Treatment Track 1, partly based on the SYGMA studies. We investigated how current clinical practice in Australia, Canada, China and the Philippines relates to latest GINA recommendations. Patients and physicians were recruited from online panels between July and August 2020 and invited to complete an online survey. Inclusion criteria: age ≥18 years, current/past physician diagnosis of asthma (patients); primary care (Canada also included respirologists/respiratory therapists), treating ≥4 patients with asthma per month, ≥3 years in clinical practice (physicians). Overall, 1216/70,183 patients and 803/8376 physicians replied and were eligible for inclusion. Only 8–15% of patients were using MART; 66–81% used regular maintenance therapy with/without an as-needed reliever. Across the four countries, physicians classified 48–63% of their patients as mild (GINA Steps 1–2) and 28–36% as moderate (GINA Steps 3–4). Generally, physicians rated symptom control over exacerbation reduction as their main treatment goal; patients also ranked symptom relief as very important. Approximately 9–29% of patients and 24–45% of physicians were unaware of MART, and among those who prescribed MART, 80–95% prescribed an additional (non-ICS) as-needed reliever. Most physicians prioritized managing asthma symptoms over exacerbations. A lack of awareness and understanding of MART dosing exists among physicians. Practical strategies are required to implement GINA recommendations effectively in real-world clinical practice and to identify appropriate patients for MART. •Most physicians prioritize symptom control over reducing exacerbations.•Patients also consider symptom relief to be very important.•Physicians classified a substantial proportion of patients as GINA Step 3 or higher.•A large number of physicians and patients were not aware of MART.•Most physicians had prescribed an additional as-needed reliver alongside MART.
ISSN:0954-6111
1532-3064
DOI:10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106524