Quantification of liver and muscular fat using contrast-enhanced Dual Source Dual Energy Computed Tomography compared to an established multi-echo Dixon MRI sequence
•No significant difference in muscular fat quantification between DECT and MRI.•Systematic underestimation of −1.7% of liver fat in DECT compared to MRI.•Liver and muscular fat quantification in portal-venous phase DECT is feasible. To investigate the feasibility of liver fat quantification in contr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of radiology 2021-09, Vol.142, p.109845-109845, Article 109845 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •No significant difference in muscular fat quantification between DECT and MRI.•Systematic underestimation of −1.7% of liver fat in DECT compared to MRI.•Liver and muscular fat quantification in portal-venous phase DECT is feasible.
To investigate the feasibility of liver fat quantification in contrast-enhanced dual source dual energy computed tomography (DECT) using multi-echo Dixon magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as reference standard.
Patients who underwent MRI of the liver including a multi-echo Dixon sequence for estimation of proton density fat fraction in 2017 as well as contrast-enhanced DECT imaging of the abdomen were included in this retrospective, monocentric IRB approved study. Furthermore, patients with a hepatic fat amount >5% who were examined in 2018 with MRI and DECT were included. The final study group consisted of 81 patients with 90 pairs of examinations. Analysis of parameter maps was performed manually using congruent regions of interest which were placed in the liver parenchyma, in the erector spinae muscles, and psoas major muscles.
Mean patient age was 61 ± 13 years. Median time between MRI and DECT was 48 days. MRI liver fat quantification resulted in a median of 3.8% (IQR: 2.2–8.2%) compared to 1.8% (IQR: 0–6.3%) in DECT (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0720-048X 1872-7727 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109845 |