Effect of baseline disease severity on achievement of treatment target with apremilast: results from a pooled analysis

Background Treating to absolute treatment targets rather than relative measures such as Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)‐75 is emerging as an important clinical concept included in psoriasis guidelines and clinical practice. Achieving treatment targets is associated with achievement of long‐...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2021-12, Vol.35 (12), p.2409-2414
Hauptverfasser: Reich, K., Mrowietz, U., Menter, A., Griffiths, C.E.M., Bagel, J., Strober, B., Nunez Gomez, N., Shi, R., Guerette, B., Lebwohl, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Treating to absolute treatment targets rather than relative measures such as Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)‐75 is emerging as an important clinical concept included in psoriasis guidelines and clinical practice. Achieving treatment targets is associated with achievement of long‐term outcomes. Objective To evaluate the relationship between psoriasis severity, disease characteristics and achievement of PASI ≤2 with apremilast in a pooled analysis of the phase 3 ESTEEM 1 and 2 (NCT01194219 and NCT01232283), phase 3b LIBERATE (NCT01690299) and phase 4 UNVEIL (NCT02425826) clinical trials. Methods Pooled data from patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis randomized to apremilast 30 mg BID were analysed by baseline PASI quartiles (Q1: 2.4–13.1; Q2: 13.2–15.9; Q3: 16.0–20.0; Q4: 20.1–57.8). Assessments included PASI, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Scalp Physician’s Global Assessment (ScPGA; ScPGA ≥1) and target (worst) Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI; NAPSI ≥1). Results Of 1062 patients, 963 had ScPGA ≥1 and 643 had NAPSI ≥1; 771 patients with baseline and Week 32 PASI assessments were included in analyses of Week 32 PASI target achievement. Rates of PASI ≤2 at Week 32 were greater in lower PASI quartiles (Q1: 43.5%; Q2: 31.2%; Q3: 26.8%; Q4: 18.4%). Most patients achieving PASI ≤2 target (83.6%) achieved DLQI ≤5 at Week 32; 59.3% of patients who did not achieve PASI ≤2 target achieved DLQI ≤5. At Week 32, mean improvements in ScPGA and NAPSI were similar with more moderate vs. more severe disease (ScPGA, range: 1.1–1.4; NAPSI, range: 1.6–2.5). In a subgroup analysis, achievement of PASI ≤2 target was higher in the lowest PASI quartile and with disease duration
ISSN:0926-9959
1468-3083
DOI:10.1111/jdv.17520