Intraoperative diastolic function assessed by TEE does not agree with preoperative diastolic function grade in CABG patients

Objective To compare the agreement of the 2016 ASE/EACVI guidelines for grading diastolic dysfunction (DD) with the most commonly used intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)‐based diastolic function grading algorithm in cardiac surgical patients, and to describe the contribution of th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2021-08, Vol.38 (8), p.1282-1289, Article echo.15137
Hauptverfasser: Harvey, Reed, Chellappa, Vivek, Mofidi, Sean, Scovotti, Jennifer, Neelankavil, Jacques P., Saddic, Louis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To compare the agreement of the 2016 ASE/EACVI guidelines for grading diastolic dysfunction (DD) with the most commonly used intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)‐based diastolic function grading algorithm in cardiac surgical patients, and to describe the contribution of the echocardiographic variables used in the algorithms to any observed differences. Design Retrospective data analysis. Setting University tertiary medical center. Participants Hundred and one patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at a single institution from June 2017 to February 2019. Interventions Preoperative transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) diastolic function grade determined by the 2016 American Society of Echocardiography (ASE)/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) guidelines was compared to intraoperative diastolic function grade obtained by TEE. Measurements and Main Results Incidence of DD on preoperative TTE was only 19.8%, while 62.3% of patients were graded as having DD on the intraoperative TEE exam. There was grade agreement between TTE and TEE in only 47/101 patients (46.5%). The McNemar test showed poor agreement between the two algorithms (OR for disagreement = 15.33, CI = 4.77–49.30; p 
ISSN:0742-2822
1540-8175
DOI:10.1111/echo.15137