Intraoperative diastolic function assessed by TEE does not agree with preoperative diastolic function grade in CABG patients
Objective To compare the agreement of the 2016 ASE/EACVI guidelines for grading diastolic dysfunction (DD) with the most commonly used intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)‐based diastolic function grading algorithm in cardiac surgical patients, and to describe the contribution of th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2021-08, Vol.38 (8), p.1282-1289, Article echo.15137 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective
To compare the agreement of the 2016 ASE/EACVI guidelines for grading diastolic dysfunction (DD) with the most commonly used intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)‐based diastolic function grading algorithm in cardiac surgical patients, and to describe the contribution of the echocardiographic variables used in the algorithms to any observed differences.
Design
Retrospective data analysis.
Setting
University tertiary medical center.
Participants
Hundred and one patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at a single institution from June 2017 to February 2019.
Interventions
Preoperative transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) diastolic function grade determined by the 2016 American Society of Echocardiography (ASE)/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) guidelines was compared to intraoperative diastolic function grade obtained by TEE.
Measurements and Main Results
Incidence of DD on preoperative TTE was only 19.8%, while 62.3% of patients were graded as having DD on the intraoperative TEE exam. There was grade agreement between TTE and TEE in only 47/101 patients (46.5%). The McNemar test showed poor agreement between the two algorithms (OR for disagreement = 15.33, CI = 4.77–49.30; p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0742-2822 1540-8175 |
DOI: | 10.1111/echo.15137 |