Pattern-sensitive patients with epilepsy use uncomfortable visual stimuli to self-induce seizures
•Pattern-sensitive patients use uncomfortable images to self-induce seizures.•Images with abnormal scores occur in the “Objects” and “Patterns” categories.•Pleasant visual symptoms change uncomfortable images into pleasant stimuli.•Photographs may help to identify epileptogenic visual stimuli.•Drawi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Epilepsy & behavior 2021-09, Vol.122, p.108189-108189, Article 108189 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Pattern-sensitive patients use uncomfortable images to self-induce seizures.•Images with abnormal scores occur in the “Objects” and “Patterns” categories.•Pleasant visual symptoms change uncomfortable images into pleasant stimuli.•Photographs may help to identify epileptogenic visual stimuli.•Drawings may contribute to describe visual symptoms.
Sensory stimuli can induce seizures in patients with epilepsy and predisposed subjects. Visual stimuli are the most common triggers, provoking seizures through an abnormal response to light or pattern. Sensitive patients may intentionally provoke their seizures through visual stimuli. Self-induction methods are widely described in photo-sensitive patients, while there are only a few reports of those who are pattern-sensitive.
We analyzed 73 images of environmental visual triggers collected from 14 pattern-sensitive patients with self-induced seizures. The images were categorized according to their topics: 29 Objects (43%); 19 Patterns (28%); 15 External scenes (22%); 4 TV or computer screens (6%). Six photos were of poor quality and were excluded from analysis. Images were analyzed by an algorithm that calculated the degree to which the Fourier amplitude spectrum differed from that in images from nature. The algorithm has been shown to predict discomfort in healthy observers. The algorithm identified thirty-one images (46%) as “uncomfortable”. There were significant differences between groups of images (ANOVA p = .0036; Chi2 p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1525-5050 1525-5069 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108189 |