Predicting primary treatment failure using interim FDG‐PET scanning in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma

Interim FDG‐PET (iPET) in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is increasingly practised and used in clinical trials to adapt further therapy. However, the optimum timing and methodology of iPET remains controversial. We retrospectively analysed the iPET results and outcomes of 200 DLBCL patients w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of haematology 2021-10, Vol.107 (4), p.475-483
Hauptverfasser: Wight, Joel, Wai, Shin Hnin, Shen, Edward, Lee, Sze‐Ting, Berlangieri, Salvatore, Fancourt, Tineke, Hawkes, Eliza, Hannah, Anthony, Leung, Teresa, Chong, Geoffrey
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Interim FDG‐PET (iPET) in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is increasingly practised and used in clinical trials to adapt further therapy. However, the optimum timing and methodology of iPET remains controversial. We retrospectively analysed the iPET results and outcomes of 200 DLBCL patients where FDG‐PET was routinely performed at baseline, after 2 cycles (iPET2) and at completion of chemoimmunotherapy. iPET was also performed after 4 cycles (iPET4) where at iPET2, Deauville score (DS) was ≥4. Scans were assessed by blinded expert lymphoma PET physicians for DS, maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax), total metabolic tumour volume (TMTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). Treatment failure was defined as death, progression or refractory disease. 95.5% of patients received R‐CHOP. No baseline PET parameter was predicted for EFS or OS independent of the NCCN‐IPI. The multivariable analysis at iPET2 showed DS5 (19.5% of cases) predicted treatment failure (HR 6.29, 95% CI 3.01‐13.17, P 
ISSN:0902-4441
1600-0609
DOI:10.1111/ejh.13684