Communication skills preparedness for practice: Is there a key ingredient in undergraduate curricula design?

To characterize medical interns’ experience regarding communication skills education and to explore potential associations with preparedness for practice. Two hundred sixty-six medical interns answered an original questionnaire specifically developed to explore how well they feel their undergraduate training had prepared them in key aspects of medical communication. Instrument’s psychometric properties were tested. Medical schools’ curricula were considered and associations explored using non-parametric tests. The questionnaire reliability was high, with Cronbach’s alphas ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 on all the factors. Core communication skills were highly rated. Perceived preparedness was lower in aspects concerning dealing with emotion, breaking bad news and communicating with speech impaired patients. Better preparedness was associated with a longitudinal integration of communication skills throughout the curriculum, simulation with standardized patients and real patient interviewing with feedback on communication skills. Integrated programs, standing on a strong experimental component, particularly combining patient-simulation strategies with continuous supervision and learner centred feedback, were associated with higher preparedness. These results support the expansion of an educational model based on simulation strategies and structured longitudinally throughout the undergraduate medical curriculum. This study intends to inform educational background and to support further development of communication skills curricula. •Perceived preparedness original questionnaire showed high validity and reliability.•Programs with a strong experiential component were associated with higher preparedness.•Patient-simulation and longitudinal curricula were associated with higher preparedness.