Long-term outcomes of posterior fossa decompression for Chiari malformation type 1: which patients are most prone to failure?

Purpose The role of an osseous-only posterior fossa decompression (PFD) for Chiari malformation type 1 (CM1) remains controversial. We reviewed long-term outcomes for patients with CM1 undergoing a PFD to evaluate if there was any difference for failure when compared to patients undergoing a PFD wit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Child's nervous system 2021-09, Vol.37 (9), p.2891-2898
Hauptverfasser: Mozaffari, Khashayar, Davidson, Laurence, Chalif, Eric, Phan, Tiffany N., Sparks, Andrew D., Myseros, John S., Oluigbo, Chima O., Keating, Robert F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose The role of an osseous-only posterior fossa decompression (PFD) for Chiari malformation type 1 (CM1) remains controversial. We reviewed long-term outcomes for patients with CM1 undergoing a PFD to evaluate if there was any difference for failure when compared to patients undergoing a PFD with duraplasty (PFDD). Methods Consecutive patients surgically treated at a single tertiary pediatric neurosurgery clinic over a 25-year period with at least 5 years of follow-up were evaluated. PFD patients were compared to those that initially received a PFDD. Demographics, surgical indications, surgical approach, outcomes, and complications were reviewed. Results A total of 60 patients were included in this study of which 25 (41.67%) underwent PFD and 35 (58.33%) underwent PFDD. Mean age at surgery was 7.41 years (range 0.4 to 18 years) with a mean follow-up of 8.23 years (range 5 to 21 years). Those that received a PFD had a lower rate of radiographic syrinx improvement ( p = 0.03), especially in the setting of holocord syringes. Failure rate was significantly higher in the PFD group (20% vs 2.90%, p = 0.03). However, complications were significantly higher in the PFDD group (17.14% vs 4.0%, p = 0.04). Conclusions PFD provides a safe treatment option with similar clinical improvements and lower post-operative complication rate compared to PFDD, albeit at the cost of greater chance of reoperation, especially in the setting of a holocord syrinx. Patients with a holocord syrinx should be considered for a PFDD as their initial procedure.
ISSN:0256-7040
1433-0350
DOI:10.1007/s00381-021-05280-y