Validating Techniques for Measurement of Cutaneous Neurofibromas: Recommendations for Clinical Trials

OBJECTIVETo assess the reliability and variability of digital calipers, 3D photography, and high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS) for measurement of cutaneous neurofibromas (cNF) in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). BACKGROUNDcNF affect virtually all patients with NF1 and are a major source o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurology 2021-08, Vol.97 (7S), p.S32-S41
Hauptverfasser: Thalheimer, Raquel D., Merker, Vanessa L., Ly, K. Ina, Champlain, Amanda, Sawaya, Jennifer, Askenazi, Naomi L., Herr, Hamilton P., Da, Jennifer L.W., Jordan, Justin T., Muzikansky, Alona, Pearce, Elizabeth Morehouse, Sakamoto, Fernanda H., Blakeley, Jaishri O., Anderson, R. Rox, Plotkin, Scott R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVETo assess the reliability and variability of digital calipers, 3D photography, and high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS) for measurement of cutaneous neurofibromas (cNF) in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). BACKGROUNDcNF affect virtually all patients with NF1 and are a major source of morbidity. Reliable techniques for measuring cNF are needed to develop therapies for these tumors. METHODSAdults with NF1 were recruited. For each participant, 6 cNF were assessed independently by 3 different examiners at 5 different time points using digital calipers, 3D photography, and HFUS. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess intrarater and interrater reliability of linear and volumetric measurements for each technique, with ICC values >0.90 defined as excellent reliability. The coefficient of variation (CV) was used to estimate the minimal detectable difference (MDD) for each technique. RESULTSFifty-seven cNF across 10 participants were evaluated. The ICC for image acquisition and measurement was >0.97 within and across examiners for HFUS and 3D photography. ICC for digital calipers was 0.62-0.88. CV varied by measurement tool, linear vs volumetric measurement, and tumor size. CONCLUSIONSHFUS and 3D photography demonstrate excellent reliability whereas digital calipers have good to excellent reliability in measuring cNF. The MDD for each technique was used to create tables of proposed thresholds for investigators to use as guides for clinical trials focused on cNF size. These criteria should be updated as the performance of these end points is evaluated.
ISSN:0028-3878
1526-632X
DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000012428