International Dermoscopy Society criteria for non‐neoplastic dermatoses (general dermatology): validation for skin of color through a Delphi expert consensus

Background The International Dermoscopy Society (IDS) recently released a set of five basic dermoscopic parameters (vessels, scales, follicular findings, “other structures,” and specific clues) encompassing a total of 31 subitems to standardize the use of dermoscopy in non‐neoplastic dermatoses, yet...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of dermatology 2022-04, Vol.61 (4), p.461-471
Hauptverfasser: Errichetti, Enzo, Ankad, Balachandra S., Jha, Abhijeet K., Sonthalia, Sidharth, Akay, Bengu N., Bakos, Roberto, Bhat, Yasmeen J., Bosseila, Manal, Braun, Ralph, Cabo, Horacio, Cohen Sabban, Emilia N., Chatterjee, Manas, Daneshpazhooh, Maryam, Jakhar, Deepak, Kaliyadan, Feroze, Kelati, Awatef, Keshavamurthy, Vinay, Neema, Shekhar, Sadek, Ahmed, Salerni, Gabriel, Swanson, David L., Tejasvi, Trilokraj, Usatine, Richard, Lallas, Aimilios
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The International Dermoscopy Society (IDS) recently released a set of five basic dermoscopic parameters (vessels, scales, follicular findings, “other structures,” and specific clues) encompassing a total of 31 subitems to standardize the use of dermoscopy in non‐neoplastic dermatoses, yet they have been developed taking into account Caucasian/Asian skin, with consequent possible limitations if used in dark skin. Objectives To validate the abovementioned criteria for the use in dark‐skinned patients (phototypes IV–VI) through an expert consensus. Methods The two‐round Delphi method was adopted, with an iterative process consisting of two rounds of email questionnaires. Potential panelists were recruited via e‐mail from all over the world based on their expertise on dermoscopy of non‐neoplastic dermatoses in skin of color. Results Twenty‐two panelists took part in the validation process. All of the five originally proposed parameters and subitems reached agreement during the first round, aside from “follicular red dots.” Additionally, during round 1, five new subitems were proposed (perifollicular scales distribution, follicular openings obliteration, broken hairs, eccrine pigmentation, and eccrine ostia obliteration), along with the possibility to change the denomination of parameter 3 (from “follicular findings” to “follicular/eccrine findings”) and split it into two subparameters (“follicular findings” and “eccrine findings”). All such proposals reached agreement during the second round and therefore were included in the final list, for a total of 37 items. Conclusions Although nearly all the dermoscopic criteria originally proposed by the IDS are applicable even to darker phototypes, several additional variables need to be assessed.
ISSN:0011-9059
1365-4632
1365-4632
DOI:10.1111/ijd.15729