Ovarian reserve and recurrence 1 year post-operatively after using haemostatic sealant and bipolar diathermy for haemostasis during laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy

•Haemostatic sealant is a feasible and effective option for haemostasis.•The antral follicle count is higher in the haemostatic sealant group at 1 year.•The use of haemostatic sealant does not increase endometrioma recurrence. Is there a difference in the ovarian reserve 1 year post-operatively in t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Reproductive biomedicine online 2021-08, Vol.43 (2), p.310-318
Hauptverfasser: Chung, Jacqueline Pui Wah, Law, Tracy Sze Man, Mak, Jennifer Sze Man, Sahota, Daljit Singh, Li, Tin Chiu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Haemostatic sealant is a feasible and effective option for haemostasis.•The antral follicle count is higher in the haemostatic sealant group at 1 year.•The use of haemostatic sealant does not increase endometrioma recurrence. Is there a difference in the ovarian reserve 1 year post-operatively in those who used a haemostatic sealant or bipolar diathermy for haemostasis during laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy for ovarian endometriomas? This was an extended follow-up observational study of a previous randomized controlled trial where women aged 18 to 40 years with 3–8 cm unilateral or bilateral endometriomas were randomized to receive haemostasis by a haemostatic sealant or bipolar diathermy following ovarian cystectomy. The primary outcome was the ovarian reserve as assessed by antral follicle count (AFC) 1 year post-operatively. Secondary outcomes included the recurrence rate of ovarian endometrioma, the change in anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and FSH concentrations, and reproductive outcomes. The significant increase in AFC at 3 months after initial surgery (P = 0.025) in the haemostatic sealant group compared with the diathermy group was sustained at 1 year (P = 0.024) but there was no difference in AMH or FSH concentrations between the groups throughout the follow-up period. The recurrence rate in the FloSeal group was 7.7% (n = 3/39) compared with 22.2% (n = 8/36) in the diathermy group (P = 0.060). The recurrence rate in women who had bilateral lesions was significantly higher than those with unilateral lesions (risk ratio 5.33, interquartile range 1.55–18.38). No difference in reproductive outcomes was found between the two groups. Applying haemostatic sealant after laparoscopic cystectomy of ovarian endometriomas produces a significantly greater improvement in AFC, which was apparent at 3-month follow-up, and was sustained at 1-year follow-up without compromising the recurrence rate.
ISSN:1472-6483
1472-6491
DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.05.003