Slowing in Peak-Alpha Frequency Recorded After Experimentally-Induced Muscle Pain is not Significantly Different Between High and Low Pain-Sensitive Subjects

•Central peak alpha frequency (PAF) slowed during long-lasting movement-related pain.•High-pain sensitive subjects showed faster PAF than low-pain sensitive subjects.•As the central PAF, the occipital PAF was slowed during long-lasting pain. Peak alpha frequency (PAF) reduces during cutaneous pain,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of pain 2021-12, Vol.22 (12), p.1722-1732
Hauptverfasser: De Martino, Enrico, Gregoret, Luisina, Zandalasini, Matteo, Graven-Nielsen, Thomas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Central peak alpha frequency (PAF) slowed during long-lasting movement-related pain.•High-pain sensitive subjects showed faster PAF than low-pain sensitive subjects.•As the central PAF, the occipital PAF was slowed during long-lasting pain. Peak alpha frequency (PAF) reduces during cutaneous pain, but no studies have investigated PAF during movement-related muscle pain. Whether high-pain sensitive (HPS) individuals exhibit a more pronounced PAF response to pain than low-pain sensitive (LPS) individuals is unclear. As a pain model, twenty-four participants received nerve growth factor injections into a wrist extensor muscle at Day 0, Day 2, and Day 4. At Day 4, a subgroup of twelve participants also undertook eccentric wrist exercise to induce additional pain. Pain numerical rating scale (NRS) scores and electroencephalography were recorded at Day 0 (before injection), Day 4, and Day 6 for 3 minutes (eyes closed) with wrist at rest (Resting-state) and extension (Contraction-state). The average pain NRS scores in contraction-state across Days were used to divide participants into HPS (NRS-scores≥2) and LPS groups. PAF was calculated by frequency decomposition of electroencephalographic recordings. Compared with Day 0, contraction NRS-scores only increased in HPS-group at Day 4 and Day 6 (P < .001). PAF in Contraction-state decreased in both groups at Day 6 compared with Day 0 (P = .011). Across days, HPS-group showed faster PAF than LPS-group during Resting-state and Contraction-state (P < .04). Average pain NRS-scores across days during Contraction-states correlated with PAF at Day 0 (P = .012). Pain NRS-scores were associated with PAF during Contraction-state at Day 4 and Day 6 (P < .05). PAF was slowed during long-lasting movement-related pain in both groups, suggesting a widespread change in cortical excitability independent of the pain sensitivity. Moreover, HPS individuals showed faster PAF than LPS individuals during muscle pain, which may reflect a different cognitive, emotional, or attentional response to muscle pain among individuals.
ISSN:1526-5900
1528-8447
DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2021.06.004