Association of baseline diaphragm, rectus femoris and vastus intermedius muscle thickness with weaning from mechanical ventilation

To determine whether baseline diaphragm (Tdi), rectus femoris (RF) and vastus intermedius (VI) muscle thickness (TRF and TRF + VI) are associated with weaning success. Right Tdi, TRF and TRF + VI were measured by ultrasonography within 36 h of intubation and diaphragmatic excursion (DE) was evaluate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Respiratory medicine 2021-08, Vol.185, p.106503-106503, Article 106503
Hauptverfasser: Er, Berrin, Simsek, Meltem, Yildirim, Mehmet, Halacli, Burcin, Ocal, Serpil, Ersoy, Ebru Ortac, Demir, Ahmet Ugur, Topeli, Arzu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To determine whether baseline diaphragm (Tdi), rectus femoris (RF) and vastus intermedius (VI) muscle thickness (TRF and TRF + VI) are associated with weaning success. Right Tdi, TRF and TRF + VI were measured by ultrasonography within 36 h of intubation and diaphragmatic excursion (DE) was evaluated at the first spontaneous breathing trial in adult critically-ill patients. Reintubation or death within 7 days after extubation was defined as weaning failure. Weaning failure and success groups were compared in terms of ultrasonographic measurements and clinical features. Thirty-eight patients were assessed for weaning, 15 (39.4%) being in the weaning failure group. The median body mass index (BMI) was lower while the median clinical frailty scale (CFS), vasopressor use, duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care and hospital mortality rate were higher in the weaning failure group, and the median TRF + VI (14.0 [12.3–26.2] vs 23.6 [21.3–27.1] mm, p = 0.03) and median DE (19.4 [14.6–24.0] vs 25.9 [19.3–38.5] mm, p = 0.045) were lower. The median Tdi was similar in two groups (1.9 [1.5–2.3] vs 2.0 [1.7–2.4] mm, p = 0.26). In ROC analysis, area under the curve for TRF + VI was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.51–0.90; p = 0.035), with 21 mm cut-off having sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 57%. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed TRF + VI 
ISSN:0954-6111
1532-3064
DOI:10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106503