Prognostic Value of Multilayer Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain in Patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction with Mildly Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fractions

Multilayer (epi-, mid- and endocardium) left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) reflects the extent of myocardial damage after ST-segment myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, the prognostic implications of multilayer LV GLS remain unclear. We studied the association between multila...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of cardiology 2021-08, Vol.152, p.11-18
Hauptverfasser: Abou, Rachid, Goedemans, Laurien, Montero-Cabezas, José M., Prihadi, Edgard A., el Mahdiui, Mohammed, Schalij, Martin J., Ajmone Marsan, Nina, Bax, Jeroen J., Delgado, Victoria
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Multilayer (epi-, mid- and endocardium) left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) reflects the extent of myocardial damage after ST-segment myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, the prognostic implications of multilayer LV GLS remain unclear. We studied the association between multilayer LV GLS and prognosis in patients with mildly reduced or preserved LV ejection fraction (EF) after STEMI. Patients with first STEMI and LVEF>45% were evaluated retrospectively. Baseline multilayer (endocardial, mid-myocardial and epicardial) LV GLS were measured on 2-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography. Patients were followed up for of all-cause mortality. A total of 569 patients (77% male, 60 ± 11 years) were included. After a median follow-up of 117 (interquartile range 106-132) months, 95 (17%) patients died. We observed no differences in baseline LVEF and peak troponin levels between survivors and non-survivors. However, non-survivors showed more impaired GLS at all layers (epicardium: -11.9 ± 2.8% vs. -13.4 ± 2.8%; mid-myocardium: -14.2 ± 3.2% vs. -15.6 ± 3.2%; endocardium: -16.5 ± 3.7% vs. -17.7 ± 3.6%, p
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.04.033