Clinical value and limitations of the preoperative C‐reactive‐protein‐to‐albumin ratio in predicting post‐operative morbidity and mortality after deceased‐donor liver transplantation: a retrospective single‐centre study

Summary Liver transplantation is still associated with a high risk of severe complications and post‐operative mortality. This study examines the predictive value of the preoperative C‐reactive‐protein‐to‐albumin ratio (CAR) regarding perioperative morbidity and mortality in deceased‐donor liver tran...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transplant international 2021-08, Vol.34 (8), p.1468-1480
Hauptverfasser: Amygdalos, Iakovos, Bednarsch, Jan, Meister, Franziska Alexandra, Erren, David, Mantas, Anna, Strnad, Pavel, Lang, Sven Arke, Ulmer, Tom Florian, Boecker, Joerg, Liu, Wenjia, Jiang, Decan, Bruners, Philipp, Neumann, Ulf Peter, Czigany, Zoltan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Liver transplantation is still associated with a high risk of severe complications and post‐operative mortality. This study examines the predictive value of the preoperative C‐reactive‐protein‐to‐albumin ratio (CAR) regarding perioperative morbidity and mortality in deceased‐donor liver transplantation (DDLT) recipients. In total, 390 DDLT recipients between 05/2010 and 03/2020 were eligible. Predictive abilities of CAR were examined through receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses. Groups were compared using parametric and non‐parametric tests as appropriate. Independent risk factors for morbidity and mortality were identified using uni‐ and multivariable logistic regression analyses. A good predictive ability for CAR was shown regarding perioperative morbidity (comprehensive complication index ≥75, Clavien–Dindo score ≥4a) and 12‐month mortality, with an ideal cut‐off of CAR = 26%. Patients with CAR>26% had significantly higher median CCI scores (60 vs. 43, P 
ISSN:0934-0874
1432-2277
DOI:10.1111/tri.13957