Clofazimine susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium avium complex and Mycobacterium abscessus: a meta-analysis study

•Incidence of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and M. abscessus group (MABS) infections is increasing worldwide.•Current antimycobacterial agents are not sufficiently effective against NTM and new drugs are needed.•Pooled rates of in vitro resistance to CFZ in MAC and MABS clinical isolates were 9....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of global antimicrobial resistance. 2021-09, Vol.26, p.188-193
Hauptverfasser: Hajikhani, Bahareh, Nasiri, Mohammad Javad, Hosseini, Sareh Sadat, Khalili, Farima, Karimi-Yazdi, Mohammadmahdi, Hematian, Ali, Nojookambari, Neda Yousefi, Goudarzi, Mehdi, Dadashi, Masoud, Mirsaeidi, Mehid
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Incidence of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and M. abscessus group (MABS) infections is increasing worldwide.•Current antimycobacterial agents are not sufficiently effective against NTM and new drugs are needed.•Pooled rates of in vitro resistance to CFZ in MAC and MABS clinical isolates were 9.0% and 16.0%, respectively.•There was no evidence of publication bias.•Accurate DST methods for all NTM and resistance monitoring are necessary for prevention and control of CFZ resistance. The incidence of infections due to Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and Mycobacterium abscessus (MABS) is increasing worldwide. Current antimycobacterial agents are not sufficiently effective against nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) and there is a need for new drugs. This study aimed to estimate the overall in vitro activity of clofazimine (CFZ) against MAC and MABS clinical isolates. We systematically searched four databases up to 1 March 2020 to identify relevant studies. Studies were included if they used the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) criteria for drug susceptibility testing (DST). We assessed the pooled in vitro CFZ resistance rate in MAC and MABS clinical isolates using a random- effects model. Sources of heterogeneity were evaluated using Cochran's Q and the I2 statistic. Potential for publication bias was explored using Begg's and Egger's tests. All analyses were conducted using Stata 14.0. A total of 20 publications (11 reports for MAC and 15 for MABS) were included. The pooled rates of in vitro resistance to CFZ in clinical isolates of MAC and MABS were 9.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.0–17.0%] and 16.0% (95% CI 4.0–34.0%), respectively. There was no evidence of publication bias. This study reports the frequency of CFZ resistance in clinical isolates of MAC and MABS. According to the results, establishing accurate DST methods for detecting CFZ resistance, performing DST for all NTM isolates to provide effective treatment, and continuous monitoring of drug resistance are suggested for the prevention and control of CFZ-resistant NTM.
ISSN:2213-7165
2213-7173
DOI:10.1016/j.jgar.2021.06.002