Subtraction improves the accuracy of coronary CT angiography for detecting obstructive disease in severely calcified segments
Objective To investigate the accuracy, diagnostic confidence, and interobserver agreement of subtraction coronary CT angiography (CCTA) versus invasive coronary angiography on 320-row CT in coronary segments with severe or non-severe calcification. Materials/methods Sixty-four patients (33 men, 66.6...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European radiology 2021-08, Vol.31 (8), p.6211-6219 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective
To investigate the accuracy, diagnostic confidence, and interobserver agreement of subtraction coronary CT angiography (CCTA) versus invasive coronary angiography on 320-row CT in coronary segments with severe or non-severe calcification.
Materials/methods
Sixty-four patients (33 men, 66.6 ± 8.2 years) with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) were prospectively enrolled from October 2019 to June 2020. The cross-sectional circumferential extent of calcification was used to classify calcified segments as non-severely ( < 180°) or severely calcified ( ≥ 180°). Three independent, blinded radiologists evaluated the severity of coronary stenosis. Interobserver agreement was evaluated using Fleiss’ kappa (κ). A multiple-reader multiple-case receiver operating characteristic (ROC) method was conducted, and diagnostic accuracy was measured using the mean areas under the ROC curves (AUCs), with ≥ 50% stenosis as a cut-off. Diagnostic confidence, diagnostic accuracy, and interobserver agreement were compared between CCTA with or without subtraction information in severely and non-severely calcified segments.
Results
In cases with severe calcification (51 patients, 146 segments), CCTA with subtraction information achieved better diagnostic accuracy (per-patient AUC: 0.73 vs 0.57,
p
= 0.03; per-segment AUC: 0.85 vs 0.62,
p
= 0.01), diagnostic confidence (3.7 vs 2.6,
p
< 0.001), and interobserver agreement (
κ
: 0.59 vs 0.30). Diagnostic accuracy (per-patient AUC: 0.81 vs 0.93,
p
= 0.30; per-patient AUC: 0.79 vs 0.82,
p
= 0.54) was not increased in cases with non-severe calcification (13 patients, 190 segments).
Conclusions
CCTA with subtraction information achieved better diagnostic accuracy in cases of severe calcification (circumferential extent ≥ 180°). However, for non-severe calcification (circumferential extent < 180°), the effect of calcium subtraction was unclear, as it did not improve diagnostic accuracy.
Key Points
• Subtraction coronary CT angiography achieves better diagnostic accuracy, higher diagnostic confidence, and increased interobserver agreement for severe calcification (circumferential extent ≥ 180°).
• Calcium subtraction does not improve the diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography for calcification with a circumferential extent of < 180°. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0938-7994 1432-1084 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00330-021-08092-5 |