Evaluation of density functional theory for a large and diverse set of organic and inorganic equilibrium structures

Density functional theory (DFT) has been extensively benchmarked for energetic properties; however, less attention has been given to equilibrium structures and the effect of using a certain DFT geometry on subsequent energetic properties. We evaluate the performance of 52 contemporary DFT methods for obtaining the structures of 122 species in the W4‐11‐GEOM database. This dataset includes a total of 246 unique bonds: 117 H─X, 65 X─Y, 49 X═Y, and 15 XY bonds (where X and Y are first‐ and second‐row atoms) and 133 key bond angles: 96 X‐Y‐H, 22 X‐Y‐Z, and 15 H‐X‐H angles. The reference geometries are optimized at the CCSD(T)/jul‐cc‐pV(n+d)Z level of theory (n = 5, 6). The performance of DFT is evaluated in conjunction with the Def2‐nZVPP (n = T, Q), cc‐pV(T+d)Z, and jul‐cc‐pV(T+d)Z basis sets. The root‐mean‐square deviations (RMSDs) over the bond distances of the best performing functionals from each rung of Jacob's Ladder are 0.0086 (SOGGA11), 0.0088 (τ‐HCTH), 0.0059 (B3LYP), 0.0054 (TPSSh), and 0.0032 (DSD‐PBEP86) Å. We evaluate the effect of the choice of the DFT geometry on subsequent molecular energies calculated with W1‐F12 theory. Geometries obtained with GGA and MGGA methods result in large RMSDs in the subsequent W1‐F12 energies; however, six hybrid GGA functionals (B3LYP, B3P86, mPW3PBE, B3PW91, mPW1LYP, and X3LYP) result in an excellent performance with RMSDs between 0.25 and 0.30 kJ mol−1 relative to the CCSD(T)/CBS reference geometries. The B2GP‐PLYP and mPW2‐PLYP DHDFT methods result in near‐CCSD(T) accuracy with RMSDs of 0.11 and 0.10 kJ mol−1, respectively. Evaluates the performance of contemporary DFT and DHDFT methods for equilibrium geometries of a wide set of 122 organic and inorganic molecules relative to CCSD(T)/CBS structures.