Is the Consensual Threshold for Defining High Glucose Variability Implementable in Clinical Practice?

OBJECTIVE Estimating glycemic variability (GV) through within-day coefficient of variation (%CVw) is recommended for patients with type 1 Diabetes (T1D). High GV (hGV) is defined as %CVw > 36%. However, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices provide exclusively total CV (%CVT). We aimed to a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes care 2021-07, Vol.44 (7), p.1722-1725
Hauptverfasser: Julla, Jean-Baptiste, Jacquemier, Pauline, Fagherazzi, Guy, Vidal-Trecan, Tiphaine, Juddoo, Vanessa, Jaziri, Asma, Mersel, Hanane, Venteclef, Nicolas, Roussel, Ronan, Massin, Pascale, Couturier, Aude, Gautier, Jean-François, Riveline, Jean-Pierre
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVE Estimating glycemic variability (GV) through within-day coefficient of variation (%CVw) is recommended for patients with type 1 Diabetes (T1D). High GV (hGV) is defined as %CVw > 36%. However, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices provide exclusively total CV (%CVT). We aimed to assess consequences of this disparity. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We retrospectively calculated both %CVT and %CVw of consecutive T1D patients from their CGM raw data during 14 days. Patients with hGV with %CVT >36% and %CVw ≤36% were called the "inconsistent GV group". RESULTS A total of 104 patients were included. Mean ± SD %CVT and %CVw were 42.4 ± 8% and 37.0 ± 7.4% respectively (P < 0.0001). Using %CVT, 81 patients (73.6%) were classified as having hGV, whereas 59 (53.6%) using %CVw (P < 0.0001) corresponding to 22 patients (21%) in the inconsistent GV population. CONCLUSIONS Evaluation of GV through %CV in patients with T1D is highly dependent on the calculation method and then must be standardized.
ISSN:0149-5992
1935-5548
DOI:10.2337/dc20-1847