Systematic assessment of structure-promiscuity relationships between different types of kinase inhibitors

[Display omitted] Given the increasing quest for selective kinase inhibitors, we have systematically investigated structural and structure-promiscuity relationships between promiscuous kinase inhibitors and other types with increasing potential for selective kinase inhibition. Therefore, inhibitors...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry 2021-07, Vol.41, p.116226-116226, Article 116226
Hauptverfasser: Hu, Huabin, Bajorath, Jürgen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[Display omitted] Given the increasing quest for selective kinase inhibitors, we have systematically investigated structural and structure-promiscuity relationships between promiscuous kinase inhibitors and other types with increasing potential for selective kinase inhibition. Therefore, inhibitors with different modes of action were extracted from X-ray structures of kinase complexes. For more than 18,000 promiscuous kinase inhibitors and 1253 type I1/2, II, and allosteric inhibitors with structurally confirmed mechanisms, analogue space was systematically charted. These inhibitors were active against a total of 426 human kinases. While nearly 80% of the promiscuous inhibitors formed related analogues series, only ~30% of other types of inhibitors were involved in such structural relationships and many of these inhibitors also had multi-kinase activity. Thus, most of the investigated type I1/2, II, and allosteric inhibitors with reported single-kinase activity were distinguished from promiscuous inhibitors, thus indicating potential for kinase selectivity. Structural relationships between promiscuous inhibitors and the subset of other inhibitors were organized in a matrix format including kinase activity profiles, revealing structure-promiscuity relationships for follow-up investigations.
ISSN:0968-0896
1464-3391
DOI:10.1016/j.bmc.2021.116226