Risk Prediction Score for Cancer Development in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome

Background:Cancer is a known prognostic factor in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but few risk assessments of cancer development after ACS have been established.Methods and Results:Of the 573 consecutive ACS admissions between January 2015 and March 2018 in Nobeoka City, Japan, 552 were...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation Journal 2024/01/25, Vol.88(2), pp.234-242
Hauptverfasser: Ishii, Masanobu, Marume, Kyohei, Nakai, Michikazu, Ogata, Soshiro, Kaichi, Ryota, Ikebe, Sou, Mori, Takayuki, Komaki, Soichi, Kusaka, Hiroaki, Toida, Reiko, Kurogi, Kazumasa, Ogawa, Hisao, Iwanaga, Yoshitaka, Miyamoto, Yoshihiro, Yamamoto, Nobuyasu, Tsujita, Kenichi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background:Cancer is a known prognostic factor in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but few risk assessments of cancer development after ACS have been established.Methods and Results:Of the 573 consecutive ACS admissions between January 2015 and March 2018 in Nobeoka City, Japan, 552 were analyzed. Prevalent cancer was defined as a treatment history of cancer, and incident cancer as post-discharge cancer incidence. The primary endpoint was post-discharge cancer incidence, and the secondary endpoint was all-cause death during follow-up. All-cause death occurred in 9 (23.1%) patients with prevalent cancer, and in 17 (3.5%) without cancer. In the multivariable analysis, prevalent cancer was associated with all-cause death. To develop the prediction model for cancer incidence, 21 patients with incident cancer and 492 without cancer were analyzed. We compared the performance of D-dimer with that of the prediction model, which added age (≥65 years), smoking history, and high red blood cell distribution width to albumin ratio (RAR) to D-dimer. The areas under the receiver-operating characteristics curves of D-dimer and the prediction model were 0.619 (95% confidence interval: 0.512–0.725) and 0.774 (0.676–0.873), respectively. Decision curve analysis showed superior net benefits of the prediction model.Conclusions:By adding elderly, smoking, and high RAR to D-dimer to the prediction model it became clinically useful for predicting cancer incidence after ACS.
ISSN:1346-9843
1347-4820
1347-4820
DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-21-0071