Does surgery benefit patients with oligometastatic or metastatic prostate cancer? – A retrospective cohort study and meta‐analysis

Background To evaluate long‐term oncological outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Methods Our study included oligometastatic PCa patients hospitalized between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2015, who recei...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Prostate 2021-08, Vol.81 (11), p.736-744
Hauptverfasser: Si, Shubin, Zheng, Bin, Wang, Zhenlin, Niu, Zhihong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background To evaluate long‐term oncological outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Methods Our study included oligometastatic PCa patients hospitalized between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2015, who received ADT with or without RP. We evaluated survival by employing Kaplan–Meier methods, with log‐rank tests and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. A meta‐analysis of previously published studies was additionally performed. Results The median follow‐up times of both groups were 68.4 months (interquartile range = 56.5–85.0). In this cohort study, significant statistical difference in preoperative total prostate‐specific antigen (tPSA; p = .121), clinical T stage (p = .115), and N stage (p = .394) were not found between the two groups. Meanwhile, the difference in overall survival (OS) between the two groups did not reach statistical significance (p = .649). A significant difference was not observed in castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)‐free survival between two groups as well (p = .183). Numbers of metastases might be an independent prognosis factor (p = .05) for OS, and postoperative tPSA is a risk predictor for CRPC‐free survival (p = .032). A meta‐analysis of four relevant studies demonstrated significant statistical difference in clinical improvement with RP plus ADT over ADT alone in OS survival (p 
ISSN:0270-4137
1097-0045
DOI:10.1002/pros.24170