Accuro ultrasound-based system with computer-aided image interpretation compared to traditional palpation technique for neuraxial anesthesia placement in obese parturients undergoing cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial
Purpose Recently, a new handheld ultrasound-based device, called Accuro, has been commercialized with a real-time automated interpretation of lumbar ultrasound images. We hypothesized that the handheld ultrasound device would improve the efficacy and safety of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CS...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of anesthesia 2021-08, Vol.35 (4), p.475-482 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
Recently, a new handheld ultrasound-based device, called Accuro, has been commercialized with a real-time automated interpretation of lumbar ultrasound images. We hypothesized that the handheld ultrasound device would improve the efficacy and safety of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) for cesarean delivery in obese parturients.
Methods
Eighty parturients with a body mass index > 30 kg∙m
−2
scheduled for elective cesarean delivery were randomly allocated equally (palpation group and ultrasound group). The primary outcome was the first insertion success rate. Secondary outcomes were the time taken to identify the needle puncture site, duration of CSEA procedure, the total time, the rate of parturients who require needle redirections, the number of skin punctures, changes in the intended interspace, and the incidence of complications.
Results
Compared to the palpation group, the first insertion success rate was significantly higher (72.5% vs. 40.0%;
P
= 0.003), and time taken to identify the needle puncture site was less (30 [26–36] vs. 39 [32–49] seconds;
P
= 0.001) in the ultrasound group. The rate of parturients who required needle redirections (40.0% vs. 72.5%;
P
= 0.003) and the incidence of paresthesia were both lower (7.5% vs. 45.0%;
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0913-8668 1438-8359 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00540-021-02922-y |