Initial femoral stem position in cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture in elderly patients is associated with early implant subsidence: A radiographic analysis

•Lower canal fill ratio is recognized as a risk factor for femoral stem subsidence.•Older age was associated with early stem subsidence.•Less medial overhang of femoral stem was associated with early subsidence. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty is a well-established treatment for displaced femoral neck frac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Injury 2021-07, Vol.52 (7), p.1801-1806
Hauptverfasser: Lo, I-Ning, Tzeng, Yun-Hsuan, Wang, Chien-Shun, Yang, Tzu-Cheng, Lin, Chun-Cheng, Chiang, Chao-Ching
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Lower canal fill ratio is recognized as a risk factor for femoral stem subsidence.•Older age was associated with early stem subsidence.•Less medial overhang of femoral stem was associated with early subsidence. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty is a well-established treatment for displaced femoral neck fracture in elderly patients. Implant subsidence is a potential complication with cementless femoral stems, and smaller canal fill ratio has been reported as a radiographic risk factor. We aimed to determine the risk factors for subsidence, particularly the initial implant position relative to the resected medial calcar of proximal femur. We retrospectively reviewed all cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasties performed using a single proximally hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem in patients with a minimum radiographic follow-up of 12 weeks between January 2017 and December 2018. The amount of subsidence (significant subsidence defined as ≥ 5 mm), canal fill ratio, and implant position relative to the point of resected medial calcar (position A: medial and superior to calcar; position B: lateral and superior to calcar; position C: lateral and inferior to calcar) were measured and analyzed. One-hundred eighty patients were identified (mean age: 80.9 years). Significant subsidence was observed in 52 patients (28.9%). On multivariate analysis, older age, lower canal fill ratio, implant position B, C, and less medial overhang of stem were independent risk factors for early implant subsidence. The risk ratio of position B and C to position A was 5.13 (95% confidence interval, 2.23-11.80). In our analysis, older age and lower canal fill ratio were associated with increased risk of subsidence, whereas implant with position A and more medial overhang were less prone to subsidence with the tapered proximally hydroxyapatite-coated implant.
ISSN:0020-1383
1879-0267
DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2021.05.006